Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jan;47(1):50-59.
doi: 10.1111/acer.14977. Epub 2022 Dec 12.

Examining new-generation transdermal alcohol biosensor performance across laboratory and field contexts

Affiliations

Examining new-generation transdermal alcohol biosensor performance across laboratory and field contexts

Talia Ariss et al. Alcohol Clin Exp Res (Hoboken). 2023 Jan.

Abstract

Background: Wrist-worn transdermal alcohol sensors have the potential to change how alcohol consumption is measured. However, hardware and data analytic challenges associated with transdermal sensor data have kept these devices from widespread use. Given recent technological and analytic advances, this study provides an updated account of the performance of a new-generation wrist-worn transdermal sensor in both laboratory and field settings.

Methods: This work leverages machine learning models to convert transdermal alcohol concentration data into estimates of Breath Alcohol Concentration (BrAC) in a large-scale laboratory sample (N = 256, study 1) and a pilot field sample (N = 27, study 2). Specifically, in both studies, the accuracy of the translation is evaluated by comparing BAC estimates yielded by BACtrack Skyn to real-time breathalyzer measurements collected in the laboratory and in the field.

Results: The newest version of the Skyn device demonstrates a substantially lower error rate than older hand-assembled prototypes (0% to 7% vs. 29% to 53%, respectively). On average, real-time estimates of BrAC yielded by these transdermal sensors are within 0.007 of true BAC readings in the laboratory context and within 0.019 of true BrAC readings in the field. In both contexts, the distance between true and estimated BrAC was larger when only alcohol episodes were examined (laboratory = 0.017; field = 0.041). Finally, results of power-law-curve projections indicate that, given their accuracy, transdermal BrAC estimates in real-world contexts have the potential to improve markedly (>25%) with adequately sized datasets for model training.

Conclusion: Findings from this study indicate that the latest version of the transdermal wrist sensor holds promise for the accurate assessment of alcohol consumption in field contexts. A great deal of additional work is needed to provide a full picture of the utility of these devices, including research with large participant samples in field contexts.

Keywords: alcohol; biosensor; blood alcohol concentration; machine learning; transdermal.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Graphs for participants with average (Median MAE) prediction accuracy from both alcohol and no-alcohol conditions in Study 1
Note. For the purposes of graphs displayed here, data from Skyn was transformed (divided by 20,000) such that it could be visualized on approximately the same scale as eBrAC and BrAC.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Power law curve projections of potential increases in the accuracy of transdermal BAC estimates in real-world contexts as sample size available for model training increase. Of note the figure above denotes estimates for overall level BrAC (and not participant-level eBAC).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Alessi SM, Barnett NP, & Petry NM (2017). Experiences with SCRAMx alcohol monitoring technology in 100 alcohol treatment outpatients. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 178, 417–424. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ash GI, Gueorguieva R, Barnett NP, Wang W, Robledo DS, DeMartini KS, Pittman B, Redeker NS, O’Malley SS, & Fucito LM (2022). Sensitivity, specificity, and tolerability of the BACTrack Skyn compared to other alcohol monitoring approaches among young adults in a field-based setting. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 46(5), 783–796. 10.1111/acer.14804 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Barnett NP (2015). Alcohol sensors and their potential for improving clinical care. Addiction, 110(1), 1–3. - PubMed
    1. Barnett NP, Souza T, Glynn TR, Luczak SE, Swift R, & Rosen IG (2015). The Transdermal Alcohol Sensor Macro (TASMAC): A rapid data processing tool for use with the SCRAMx alcohol sensor. Alcoholism: Clinical & Experimental Research, 39, 192A.
    1. Caddy GR, Sobell MB, & Sobell LC (1978). Alcohol breath tests: Criterion times for avoiding contamination by “mouth alcohol.” Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation, 10(6), 814–818. 10.3758/BF03205406 - DOI

Publication types