Factors influencing defensive medicine-based decision-making in primary care: A scoping review
- PMID: 36433885
- DOI: 10.1111/jep.13799
Factors influencing defensive medicine-based decision-making in primary care: A scoping review
Abstract
Rationale, aims and objectives: Medical decision-making processes in primary care are influenced by defensive medical practice. This involves a high possibility for negative consequences on many levels, for example, patient's health, health care system costs and a crisis of trust in the patient-doctor relationship. Aim of this review was to identify factors of defensive medicine-based decision-making in primary care.
Methods: This scoping review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines and included systematic research on MEDLINE, Google Scholar and two German databases for additional grey literature. References provided further literature. Articles in English and German published from 1 January 1982 to 15 June 2022 were assessed.
Results: From 911 publications screened, 13 publications [6 qualitative studies and 7 quantitative (3 cross-sectional) studies] were included. In these, four main categories of factors influencing defensive medical practice were identified: (social) media, patients adopting a consumer attitude, health care system based working conditions and physician's tolerance for uncertainty. Pressure deriving from these four different sources is exerted on the general practitioner and may result in a defensive medical decision behaviour.
Conclusions: Four categories on influencing factors of defensive medicine could be identified. Strategies to tolerate uncertainty should be trained in under- and postgraduate training.
Keywords: decision-making; defensive medicine; factors; general practitioners; influence; overdiagnosis; primary care.
© 2022 The Authors. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Vandersteegen T, Marneffe W, Cleemput I, Vandijck D, Vereeck L. The determinants of defensive medicine practices in Belgium. Health Eco, Policy Law. 2017;12(3):363-386. doi:10.1017/S174413311600030X
-
- Pellino IM, Pellino G. Consequences of defensive medicine, second victims, and clinical-judicial syndrome on surgeons' medical practice and on health service. Updates Surg. 2015;67(4):331-337. doi:10.1007/s13304-015-0338-8
-
- Steurer J, Gächter T. Defensive Medizin-unnötige Medizin. Swiss Medical Forum. 2015;37:814.
-
- Summerton N. Positive and negative factors in defensive medicine: a questionnaire study of general practitioners. BMJ. 1995;310(6971):27-29. doi:10.1136/bmj.310.6971.27
-
- Antoci A, Fiori Maccioni A, Russu P. The ecology of defensive medicine and malpractice litigation. PLoS One. 2016;11(3):e0150523. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0150523
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources