Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2022 Nov 25;22(1):905.
doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-03622-2.

Effects of hydrolysed meat on dietary intake and nutritional status in aged care residents requiring pureed diets: a crossover randomised controlled trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Effects of hydrolysed meat on dietary intake and nutritional status in aged care residents requiring pureed diets: a crossover randomised controlled trial

Xiaojing Sharon Wu et al. BMC Geriatr. .

Abstract

Background: As a result of the high prevalence of dysphagia in aged care facilities, demand for pureed diets is increasing. One of the biggest challenges for pureed diets is the reduced nutritional density due to the cooking process, such as when blending or softening with liquid. This study aimed to investigate the impact of innovative energy and protein-enriched meat puree on the nutrition intake and nutritional status of aged care residents requiring pureed diets.

Methods: This is a single-blinded randomised controlled trial conducted in two aged care facilities using a crossover design. Twenty-two residents aged 83.2 ± 7.3 years participated in a 12-week study. Participants were blocked randomised into two groups and received a 6-week of either control (unaltered freshly made pureed diets by facilities) or intervention diet, followed by a 2-week washout and then 6-week of alternative treatment. During the intervention, freshly made meat pureed portions were swapped to hydrolysed meat, which contained 144 -392 kcal and 5.6-6.8 g more energy and protein per 100 g. Nutrition intake was collected using a validated visual estimation method over 24 h on two non-consecutive days during the control and intervention phases. A two-tailed t-test was used to compare the significance.

Results: The intervention diet significantly increased energy (147 ± 285 kcal, p = .02), protein (4 ± 7 g, p = .04), and fat (3 ± 8 g, p = .07) intake in comparison to the control diet. Nutritional status was improved by the end of the intervention as evidenced by a higher nutritional assessment score using Mini-Nutritional Assessment - Short Form (9.1 ± 1.8) and a weight gain of 1.3 ± 1.7 g, p = .04. No significant differences were found in body composition using bioelectrical impedance analysis, calf circumference and mid-upper arm circumference. Though handgrip strength did not differ at the end of control and intervention, significance was found between the changes in control and intervention period. Plasma branched-chain amino acid increased significantly with hydrolysed meat consumption.

Conclusions: As a dietary enrichment, hydrolysed meat is a promising intervention for pureed diet consumers in aged care facilities, improving residents' dietary intake and reducing malnutrition risk. Future larger multicentre studies with longer intervention periods are required to confirm the effectiveness and residents' acceptance.

Trial registration: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12622000888763).

Keywords: Aged care; Dysphagia; Enrichment; Hydrolysed meat; Malnutrition; Puree; Texture-modified diets.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Study design. Only the protein component differed between control and intervention. Pureed hydrolysed beef/chicken was offered at lunch and dinner instead of the usual pureed protein in control diet. Other components in pureed meals were the freshly made carbohydrate and vegetable portions based on daily menus. T0 = week 1, T1 = week 7, T2 = week 9, T3 = week 15
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Comparison of the apperances of intervention diet and control diet. Intervention diet (left) with hydrolysed meat (brown portion). The control diet (right) with freshly made pureed meat (brown portion)

References

    1. Bhattacharyya N. The prevalence of dysphagia among adults in the United States. Gen Otolaryngol. 2014;151(5):765–769. doi: 10.1177/0194599814549156. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Serra-Prat M, Hinojosa G, López D, Juan M, Fabré E, Voss DS, et al. Prevalence of oropharyngeal dysphagia and impaired safety and efficacy of swallow in independently living older persons. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2011;59(1):186–187. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.03227.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Baijens LWJ, Clavé P, Cras P, Ekberg O, Forster A, Kolb G, et al. European Society for Swallowing Disorders – European Union Geriatric Medicine Society white paper: oropharyngeal dysphagia as a geriatric syndrome. Clin Interv Aging. 2016;11:1403–1428. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S107750. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lin LC, Wu SC, Chen HS, Wang TG, Chen MY. Prevalence of impaired swallowing in institutionalized older people in Taiwan. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2002;50(6):1118–1123. doi: 10.1046/j.1532-5415.2002.50270.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Namasivayam AM, Steele CM. Malnutrition and Dysphagia in Long-Term Care: A Systematic Review. J Nutr Gerontol Geriatr. 2015;34(1):1–21. doi: 10.1080/21551197.2014.1002656. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types