Psychological distress and bowel cancer screening participation
- PMID: 36434675
- DOI: 10.1002/pon.6072
Psychological distress and bowel cancer screening participation
Abstract
Objective: To better understand barriers to participation in mail-out bowel cancer screening programs, two survey studies tested the relationship between psychological distress and self-reported bowel cancer screening.
Methods: First, a nationally representative sample of Australians N = 5421 completed measures of bowel cancer screening and psychological distress (using the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale; K10). Second, N = 479 completed a survey measuring participation in the National Bowel Cancer Screening Program (NBCSP) and psychological distress using the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale. In both studies, logistic regressions were conducted to test relationships between psychological distress and self-reported screening participation.
Results: Study one found that psychological distress had a significant quadratic effect on having ever screened for bowel cancer, where screening rates were similar for those with low, moderate, or high levels of distress, but were lower for those with very high levels of distress. In study two, depression scores had a negative linear relationship with NBCSP participation (higher depression levels were associated with lower screening participation), and anxiety had a quadratic effect whereby NBCSP participation rates were higher with increasing levels of anxiety except in the severe category, where participation was significantly lower.
Conclusions: Findings indicate that psychological distress has a complex relationship with screening, and those with extreme levels of distress consistently show lower participation rates. Special efforts to encourage screening may be required for those experiencing extreme psychological distress and mental health disorders.
Keywords: anxiety; bowel; cancer; colorectal; depression; faecal occult blood testing (FOBT); oncology; psycho-oncology; screening; stress.
© 2022 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Similar articles
-
Faecal occult blood testing (FOBT)-based colorectal cancer screening trends and predictors of non-use: findings from the South Australian setting and implications for increasing FOBT uptake.Aust Health Rev. 2018 Feb;42(1):45-52. doi: 10.1071/AH16126. Aust Health Rev. 2018. PMID: 28248632
-
Factors associated with participation in colorectal cancer screening in Australia: Results from the 45 and Up Study cohort.Prev Med. 2018 Jan;106:185-193. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.10.032. Epub 2017 Nov 3. Prev Med. 2018. PMID: 29109015
-
The SMARTscreen Trial: a randomised controlled trial investigating the efficacy of a GP-endorsed narrative SMS to increase participation in the Australian National Bowel Cancer Screening Program.Trials. 2022 Jan 12;23(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05877-3. Trials. 2022. PMID: 35022080 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Australia's national bowel cancer screening program: does it work for indigenous Australians?BMC Public Health. 2010 Jun 25;10:373. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-373. BMC Public Health. 2010. PMID: 20579344 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Screening colonoscopy in Australia.Dig Endosc. 2015 Apr;27 Suppl 1:30-4. doi: 10.1111/den.12419. Dig Endosc. 2015. PMID: 25523496 Review.
Cited by
-
Co-designing planning interventions to facilitate participation in mail-out bowel cancer screening.BMC Public Health. 2024 Sep 5;24(1):2418. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19867-y. BMC Public Health. 2024. PMID: 39237922 Free PMC article.
-
Defining and Assessing Distress in Oncology Patients: A Systematic Review of the Literature.Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Aug 12;13(16):1976. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13161976. Healthcare (Basel). 2025. PMID: 40868590 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Understanding the mechanisms underlying the socioeconomic disparities in cancer screening among Australian women.BMC Public Health. 2024 Dec 18;24(1):3437. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-20901-2. BMC Public Health. 2024. PMID: 39695486 Free PMC article.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA A Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(3):209-249. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21660
-
- Ananda S, Wong H, Faragher I, et al. Survival impact of the Australian national bowel cancer screening programme. Intern Med J. 2016;46(2):166-171. https://doi.org/10.1111/imj.12916
-
- Navarro M, Nicolas A, Ferrandez A, Lanas A. Colorectal cancer population screening programs worldwide in 2016: an update. World J Gastroenterol. 2017;23(20):3632. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v23.i20.3632
-
- Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. National Bowel Cancer Screening Program monitoring 2021 [Internet]. Canberra: AIHW; 2021 [cited 2021 Jul 22]. https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/cancer-screening/nbcsp-monitoring-report...
-
- Goodwin BC, March S, Crawford-Williams F, Chambers SK, Dunn J. “I’m not doing that.” an in-depth examination of nonparticipation in mail-out bowel cancer screening programs. Transl Behav Med. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1093/tbm/ibz096
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials