Robot-assisted laparoscopic repair of cesarean scar defect: a systematic review of clinical evidence
- PMID: 36436106
- DOI: 10.1007/s11701-022-01502-w
Robot-assisted laparoscopic repair of cesarean scar defect: a systematic review of clinical evidence
Abstract
We aim to assess the available evidence concerning the robot-assisted repair of cesarean scar defect. A systematic PubMed and Scopus search was conducted. All databases were assessed up to May 23, 2022. Studies reporting data on robot-assisted repair of cesarean scar defect were included in this review. Data of 34 patients are presented. The mean age of the patients was 34.8 years old. The mean number of times a woman has been pregnant (gravidity) was 3.1, while the mean number of parity among the included women was 1.9. The mean number of previous cesarean sections among the included women is 1.8. The commonest symptoms at presentation of cesarean scar defect were vaginal bleeding, dysmenorrhea, abdominal pain, secondary infertility amenorrhea and ectopic cesarean scar pregnancy. The gestational age at time of surgery ranged between 6 and 14 weeks. The mean operative time was 165.2 min, while the reported blood loss during the operation ranged between 0 and 400 ml. Bladder perforation was the only intraoperative complication reported (1 out of 34, 2.9%). No conversion to open was reported. The mean interval between the last cesarean section and the development of cesarean scar defect was 22.8 months. Subsequent pregnancy after robotic assisted repair was reported in 16 out of 34 patients (47.1%). Robot-assisted treatment for cesarean scar defect has acceptable effectiveness and risks. Based on available data, uterus-sparing therapy should be considered in patients with cesarean scar pregnancies or symptomatic cesarean scar defect who wish to preserve their fertility. Finally, the role of a combined robotic and hysteroscopic correction of cesarean scar defect for reducing the blood loss and reducing the following obstetrical complications warrants future research.
Keywords: Cesarean delivery; Cesarean scar defect; Cesarean section; Robotic; Robotic assisted laparoscopy; Robotic surgery.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature.
Similar articles
-
Minimally Invasive Surgery for the Excision and Repair of Cesarean Scar Defect: A Scoping Review of the Literature.Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 Jun 21;61(7):1123. doi: 10.3390/medicina61071123. Medicina (Kaunas). 2025. PMID: 40731753 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Emerging Manifestations of Cesarean Scar Defect in Reproductive-aged Women.J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2016 Sep-Oct;23(6):893-902. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2016.06.020. Epub 2016 Jul 5. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2016. PMID: 27393285
-
A feasible procedure for laparoscopic cesarean scar defect repair.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2025 Mar;232(3):332-335. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2024.10.003. Epub 2024 Oct 10. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2025. PMID: 39393482
-
The association of endometrial closure during cesarean section to the risk of developing uterine scar defect: a randomized control trial.Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2024 May;309(5):2063-2070. doi: 10.1007/s00404-024-07417-1. Epub 2024 Mar 18. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2024. PMID: 38498161 Clinical Trial.
-
Epidural versus non-epidural or no analgesia for pain management in labour.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 May 21;5(5):CD000331. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000331.pub4. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018. PMID: 29781504 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Minimally Invasive Surgery for the Excision and Repair of Cesarean Scar Defect: A Scoping Review of the Literature.Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 Jun 21;61(7):1123. doi: 10.3390/medicina61071123. Medicina (Kaunas). 2025. PMID: 40731753 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Clinical study of two reversible arterial blockade methods in the treatment of scar pregnancy under combined hysterolaparoscopy.Am J Transl Res. 2024 Nov 15;16(11):6770-6778. doi: 10.62347/UOBH1544. eCollection 2024. Am J Transl Res. 2024. PMID: 39678625 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Gibbons L, Belizán JM, Lauer JA, Betrán AP, Merialdi M, Althabe F (2010) The global numbers and costs of additionally needed and unnecessary caesarean sections performed per year: overuse as a barrier to universal coverage. http://www.who.int/healthsystems/topics/financing/healthreport/30C-secti... . Accessed 23 May 2022
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources