Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Dec;27(8):3695-3711.
doi: 10.1007/s40519-022-01512-5. Epub 2022 Nov 27.

A consensus document on definition and diagnostic criteria for orthorexia nervosa

Affiliations

A consensus document on definition and diagnostic criteria for orthorexia nervosa

Lorenzo M Donini et al. Eat Weight Disord. 2022 Dec.

Erratum in

  • Correction: A consensus document on definition and diagnostic criteria for orthorexia nervosa.
    Donini LM, Barrada JR, Barthels F, Dunn TM, Babeau C, Brytek-Matera A, Cena H, Cerolini S, Cho HH, Coimbra M, Cuzzolaro M, Ferreira C, Galfano V, Grammatikopoulou MG, Hallit S, Håman L, Hay P, Jimbo M, Lasson C, Lindgren EC, McGregor R, Minnetti M, Mocini E, Obeid S, Oberle CD, Onieva-Zafra MD, Opitz MC, Parra-Fernández ML, Pietrowsky R, Plasonja N, Poggiogalle E, Rigó A, Rodgers RF, Roncero M, Saldaña C, Segura-Garcia C, Setnick J, Shin JY, Spitoni G, Strahler J, Stroebele-Benschop N, Todisco P, Vacca M, Valente M, Varga M, Zagaria A, Zickgraf HF, Reynolds RC, Lombardo C. Donini LM, et al. Eat Weight Disord. 2023 Sep 16;28(1):76. doi: 10.1007/s40519-023-01599-4. Eat Weight Disord. 2023. PMID: 37715868 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

Abstract

Purpose: Since the term orthorexia nervosa (ON) was coined from the Greek (ὀρθός, right and ὄρεξις, appetite) in 1997 to describe an obsession with "correct" eating, it has been used worldwide without a consistent definition. Although multiple authors have proposed diagnostic criteria, and many theoretical papers have been published, no consensus definition of ON exists, empirical primary evidence is limited, and ON is not a standardized diagnosis. These gaps prevent research to identify risk and protective factors, pathophysiology, functional consequences, and evidence-based therapeutic treatments. The aims of the current study are to categorize the common observations and presentations of ON pathology among experts in the eating disorder field, propose tentative diagnostic criteria, and consider which DSM chapter and category would be most appropriate for ON should it be included.

Methods: 47 eating disorder researchers and multidisciplinary treatment specialists from 14 different countries across four continents completed a three-phase modified Delphi process, with 75% agreement determined as the threshold for a statement to be included in the final consensus document. In phase I, participants were asked via online survey to agree or disagree with 67 statements about ON in four categories: A-Definition, Clinical Aspects, Duration; B-Consequences; C-Onset; D-Exclusion Criteria, and comment on their rationale. Responses were used to modify the statements which were then provided to the same participants for phase II, a second round of feedback, again in online survey form. Responses to phase II were used to modify and improve the statements for phase III, in which statements that met the predetermined 75% of agreement threshold were provided for review and commentary by all participants.

Results: 27 statements met or exceeded the consensus threshold and were compiled into proposed diagnostic criteria for ON.

Conclusions: This is the first time a standardized definition of ON has been developed from a worldwide, multidisciplinary cohort of experts. It represents a summary of observations, clinical expertise, and research findings from a wide base of knowledge. It may be used as a base for diagnosis, treatment protocols, and further research to answer the open questions that remain, particularly the functional consequences of ON and how it might be prevented or identified and intervened upon in its early stages. Although the participants encompass many countries and disciplines, further research will be needed to determine if these diagnostic criteria are applicable to the experience of ON in geographic areas not represented in the current expert panel.

Level of evidence: Level V: opinions of expert committees.

Keywords: Anorexia nervosa (AN); Avoidant restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID); Eating disorder; Feeding and eating disorders (F&ED); Obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD); Orthorexia nervosa (ON).

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None of the authors display any conflict of interest in the production of this manuscript.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Geographic distribution of the contributors

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Dunn TM, Bratman S. On orthorexia nervosa: A review of the literature and proposed diagnostic criteria. Eat Behav. 2016;21:11–17. doi: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2015.12.006. - DOI - PubMed
    1. McComb SE, Mills JS. Orthorexia nervosa: A review of psychosocial risk factors. Appetite. 2019;140:50–75. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2019.05.005. - DOI - PubMed
    1. American Psychiatric Association (APA) (2022) Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, Text Revision (DSM-5-TR), 5th edn. Amer Psychiatric Pub Inc
    1. World Health Organization (WHO) (2022) ICD-11, International classification of diseases for mortality and morbidity statistics. World Health Organization, Geneva
    1. Meule A, Voderholzer U. Orthorexia Nervosa-it is time to think about abandoning the concept of a distinct diagnosis. Front Psychiatry. 2021;12:640401. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.640401. - DOI - PMC - PubMed