Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Feb;54(2):691-703.
doi: 10.1007/s10803-022-05795-6. Epub 2022 Nov 27.

Development of Moral Judgments in Impersonal and Personal Dilemmas in Autistic Spectrum Disorders from Childhood to Late Adolescence

Affiliations

Development of Moral Judgments in Impersonal and Personal Dilemmas in Autistic Spectrum Disorders from Childhood to Late Adolescence

Melanie Labusch et al. J Autism Dev Disord. 2024 Feb.

Abstract

A potential underlying mechanism associated with the difficulties in social interactions in Autistic Spectrum Disorders (ASD) concerns the abnormal development of moral reasoning. The present study examined utilitarian and deontological judgments in impersonal and personal moral dilemmas, comparing 66 individuals with ASD and 61 typically developing (TD) individuals between 6 and 18 years. Utilitarian judgments decreased with age. This decline was much more gradual for personal dilemmas in the ASD than in the TD group. ASD individuals rated utilitarian judgments as more appropriate but felt less calm, consistent with the Empathy Imbalance hypothesis. Utilitarian judgments were associated with social interaction difficulties in ASD. These findings identify possible social therapeutic targets for more efficient coping strategies in individuals with ASD.

Keywords: Autistic spectrum disorders; Dual-process theory; Empathy; Moral dilemma; Social cognition.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no competing interest to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow diagram describing the recruitment process, the exclusion determinants, and the patients who completed the study
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Partial dependence plots for the probability of a utilitarian response over age, separately for personal and impersonal dilemmas, for TD individuals (left panel) and individuals with ASD (right panel)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Appropriateness and calmness after utilitarian responses for each dilemma in each participant group
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Association between the probability of a utilitarian response in the personal dilemma and the ADI-R social interaction score in the ASD group
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Examples of the pictograms that were used for the self-report

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Achenbach TM. Child behaviour checklist/4-18. University of Vermont; 1991.
    1. American Psychiatric Association . Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-5®) American Psychiatry Association; 2013.
    1. Bara BG, Bucciarelli M, Lombardo V. Model theory of deduction: A unified computational approach. Cognitive Science. 2001;25(6):839–901. doi: 10.1207/s15516709cog2506_1. - DOI
    1. Baron-Cohen S. Autism: The empathizing-systemizing (e-s) theory. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 2009;1156(1):68–80. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04467.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Baron-Cohen S, Ring HA, Bullmore ET, Wheelwright S, Ashwin C, Williams SCR. The amygdala theory of autism. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews. 2000;24(3):355–364. doi: 10.1016/S0149-7634(00)00011-7. - DOI - PubMed