The evolving landscape of pulmonary arterial hypertension clinical trials
- PMID: 36436527
- DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)01601-4
The evolving landscape of pulmonary arterial hypertension clinical trials
Abstract
Although it is a rare disease, the number of available therapeutic options for treating pulmonary arterial hypertension has increased since the late 1990s, with multiple drugs developed that are shown to be effective in phase 3 randomised controlled trials. Despite considerable advancements in pulmonary arterial hypertension treatment, prognosis remains poor. Existing therapies target pulmonary endothelial dysfunction with vasodilation and anti-proliferative effects. Novel therapies that target proliferative vascular remodelling and affect important outcomes are urgently needed. There is need for additional innovations in clinical trial design so that all emerging candidate therapies can be rigorously studied. Pulmonary arterial hypertension trial design has shifted from short-term submaximal exercise capacity as a primary endpoint, to larger clinical event-driven trial outcomes. Event-driven pulmonary arterial hypertension trials could face feasibility and efficiency issues in the future because increasing sample sizes and longer follow-up durations are needed, which would be problematic in such a rare disease. Enrichment strategies, innovative and alternative trial designs, and novel trial endpoints are potential solutions that could improve the efficiency of future pulmonary arterial hypertension trials while maintaining robustness and clinically meaningful evidence.
Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of interests JW received research grants paid to his institution from Janssen, Actelion, Merck, and Bayer; consulting fees paid personally from Janssen; honoraria for lectures from Janssen; payment for expert testimony from Sprigings Intellectual Property Law; travel support from Janssen; and payment for participation in advisory boards from Janssen and Acceleron. AB received grants paid to her institution from Acceleron, Janssen, and MSD; honoraria for lectures from Janssen, MSD, and AOP Orphan; and travel support from Janssen. AP received a training grant from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute paid to his institution; and discloses stock or stock options in Bristol Myers Squibb. DM received research grants paid to his institution from Acceleron, Janssen, and Merck; consulting fees from Acceleron; and honoraria for lectures from Bayer, Janssen, and Merck. FZ has received consulting fees from Amgen, Applied Therapeutics, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Cellprothera, CVRx, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, AstraZeneca, Cardior, Novo Nordisk, Servier, and Vifor Fresenius; honoraria for lectures from Boehringer Ingelheim, Bayer, and Vifor Fresenius; payment for expert testimony from Hogan Lovells; advisory board payment from Acceleron; holds a leadership role with CardioVascular Clinical Trials; and holds stock or stock options with Cereno, G3 Pharmaceuticals, and Cardior. MG-M received grants paid to her institution from Altavant, Aerovate, Acceleron, Merck, Bayer, and United Therapeutics; consulting fees from Acceleron, Merck, Bayer, Altavant, Janssen, and United Therapeutics; honoraria for continuing medical education from Medscape; advisory board payments from Janssen, Aerovate, and Gilead; and holds leadership roles on the board of directors for the International Society of Heart & Lung Transplantation, Scientific Leadership Committee of the Pulmonary Hypertension Association, and Scientific Advisory Board of United Therapeutics. VM has received grants paid to his institution from Acceleron, Janssen, Sonovie, and United Therapeutics; consulting fees from Acceleron, Aerovate, Altavant, Bayer, Caremark, Civi Biopharma, Corvista, Gossamer Bio, Janssen, Merck, and United Therapeutics; and holds a leadership role on the Board of Directors at Clene. GS received consulting fees from MSD, Bayer, Actelion, and Janssen; payment for lectures from MSD, Bayer, Actelion, and Janssen; and advisory board payments from Acceleron. MH received grants paid to his institution from Acceleron, AOP Orphan, Janssen, Merck, and Shou Ti; consulting fees from Acceleron, Aerovate, Altavant, AOP Orphan, Bayer, Chiesi, Ferrer, Janssen, Merck, MorphogenIX, and United Therapeutics; honoraria for lectures from Janssen and Merck; and advisory board payments from Acceleron, Altavant, Janssen, Merck, and United Therapeutics. KP received research grants from the British Heart Foundation and SPARKS society in 1995–98 for unrelated work, and has no additional interests to declare. All other authors declare no competing interests. Disclaimer: The views expressed in this manuscript are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the US Food and Drug Administration or the United States Department of Health and Human Services.
Comment in
-
Ordinal outcomes add value to clinical trials.Lancet. 2023 Mar 25;401(10381):995. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)00137-X. Lancet. 2023. PMID: 36965967 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
