Short-term outcomes after an enhanced recovery after surgery protocol in abdominal hysterectomies for leiomyomas in a teaching hospital
- PMID: 36436948
- DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.14594
Short-term outcomes after an enhanced recovery after surgery protocol in abdominal hysterectomies for leiomyomas in a teaching hospital
Abstract
Objective: To compare the perioperative outcomes of patients undergoing abdominal hysterectomies for leiomyomas before and after the implementation of an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol in a teaching hospital.
Methods: This prospective cohort study compared a patient group from a historical series (pre-ERAS) with another group after ERAS implementation. Fasting time, length of hospital stay, complications, readmission rates, and procedure-related hospital costs were analyzed.
Results: Altogether, 187 patients were included in the analysis: 92 (49.2%) and 95 (50.8%) in the pre-ERAS and ERAS groups, respectively. Both groups had similar clinical characteristics. We observed reductions in surgical outcome findings: fasting time (13.9 to 6.7 h, P < 0.001), bladder catheter usage (21.1 to 10.9 h, P < 0.001), infection rates (20.7% to 5.3%, P = 0.002), length of stay (57.5 to 37.6 h), and 38.4% of the total estimated mean cost per procedure (USD $1570.8 to USD $967.2, P < 0.001) in the pre-ERAS and ERAS groups, respectively. Hospital readmission rates (P > 0.99) did not increase.
Conclusion: ERAS protocol implementation for hysterectomies involving uterine leiomyomas reduced the length of hospital stay, surgical site infection rates, and hospital costs. A mean savings of USD $603.6 per procedure would allow 62.4% more hysterectomies to be performed.
Keywords: ERAS; abdominal hysterectomy; gynecologic surgery; health cost; leiomyoma; length of stay; perioperative care.
© 2022 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Aarts JWM, Nieboer TE, Johnson N, et al. Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;8:CD003677. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD003677.pub5
-
- Augusto KL, Brilhante AVM, Modesto GCD, et al. Costs and mortality rates of surgical approaches to hysterectomy in Brazil. Rev Saude Publica. 2018;52:25. doi:10.11606/S1518-8787.2018052000129
-
- Augusto CF, Caraça DB, Podgaec S. Epidemiological analysis of hysterectomies performed at the public health system in the largest Brazilian city. Rev Assoc Med Bras. 1992;2021(67):937-941. doi:10.1590/1806-9282.20210093
-
- Kehlet H, Wilmore DW. Multimodal strategies to improve surgical outcome. Am J Surg. 2002;183:630-641. doi:10.1016/s0002-9610(02)00866-8
-
- Wijk L, Franzen K, Ljungqvist O, Nilsson K. Implementing a structured enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol reduces length of stay after abdominal hysterectomy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2014;93:749-756. doi:10.1111/aogs.12423
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources