Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Nov 10:13:951451.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.951451. eCollection 2022.

Clinical EFT as an evidence-based practice for the treatment of psychological and physiological conditions: A systematic review

Dawson Church  1 , Peta Stapleton  2 , Anitha Vasudevan  1 , Tom O'Keefe  2
Affiliations

Clinical EFT as an evidence-based practice for the treatment of psychological and physiological conditions: A systematic review

Dawson Church et al. Front Psychol. .

Abstract

Background: Since the turn of the century, Emotional Freedom Techniques (EFT) has come into widespread use in medical and psychological treatment settings. It is also used as self-help by tens of millions of people each year. Clinical EFT, the manualized form of the method, has been validated as an "evidence-based" practice using criteria published by the American Psychological Association (APA) Division 12 Task Force on Empirically Validated Therapies. Its three essential ingredients are exposure, cognitive framing, and acupressure.

Objectives: In 2013 we published a paper defining Clinical EFT and reviewing published research. It has been viewed or downloaded over 36,000 times, indicating widespread interest in this treatment modality. Here we update our findings based on subsequently published literature and propose directions for future research.

Method: We performed a systematic review of the literature to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and meta-analyses. Retrieval of 4,167 results resulted in the identification of 56 RCTs (n = 2,013), 41 of which were published subsequent to our earlier review, as well as eight meta-analyses.

Results: RCTs have found EFT treatment to be effective for (a) psychological conditions such as anxiety, depression, phobias, and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD); (b) physiological issues such as pain, insomnia, and autoimmune conditions; (c) professional and sports performance; and (d) biological markers of stress. Meta-analyses evaluating the effect of EFT treatment have found it to be "moderate" to "large." Successful independent replication studies have been carried out for anxiety, depression, PTSD, phobias, sports performance, and cortisol levels. We outline the next steps in EFT research. These include determining its impact on cancer, heart disease, diabetes, and cognitive impairment; analysis of the large-scale datasets made possible by mobile apps; and delivery through channels such as virtual practitioner sessions, artificial intelligence agents, online courses, apps, virtual reality platforms, and standardized group therapy.

Conclusions: Subsequent research has confirmed the conclusions of earlier studies. These find Clinical EFT to be efficacious for a range of psychological and physiological conditions. Comparatively few treatment sessions are required, treatment is effective whether delivered in person or virtually, and symptom improvements persist over time. Treatment is associated with measurable biological effects in the dimensions of gene expression, brain synchrony, hormonal synthesis, and a wide range of biomarkers. Clinical EFT is a stable and mature method with an extensive evidence base. Its use in primary care settings as a safe, rapid, reliable, and effective treatment for both psychological and medical diagnoses continues to grow.

Keywords: PTSD; anxiety; depression; emotional freedom techniques (EFT); insomnia; obesity; pain; somatic symptoms.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

DC and PS derive income from publications and presentations on the therapeutic method described. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The reviewer RH declared a shared affiliation with the authors DC and AV to the handling editor at the time of review.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Hierarchy of evidence.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Abdi M. R., Abolmaali K. (2015). The effect of emotional freedom technique (EFT) therapy on the reduction of aggression in single mothers. Appl. Math. Eng. Manage. Technol. 3, 476–483.
    1. Al-Hadethe A., Hunt N., Ghaffar A., Thomas S. (2015). Randomised controlled study comparing two psychological therapies for posttraumatic stress disorder: emotional freedom technique (EFT) vs. narrative exposure therapy (NET). J. Traumatic Stress Disord. Treat. 4, 1–12. 10.4172/2324-8947.1000145 - DOI
    1. American Psychological Association (APA) (2021). Psychological Treatments. APA Division 12, Society of Clinical Psychology. Available online at: https://div12.org/treatments
    1. Anderson A., Rubik B., Absenger W. (2019). Does combining emotional freedom techniques and hypnosis have an effect on sexual assault-specific posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms? Energy Psychol. Theory Res. Treat. 11, 31–49. 10.9769/EPJ.2019.11.2.KA - DOI
    1. Babamahmoodi A., Arefnasab Z., Noorbala A. A., Ghanei M., Babamahmoodie F., Alipour A., et al. . (2015). Emotional Freedom Technique (EFT) effects on psychoimmunological factors of chemically pulmonary injured veterans. Iran. J. Allergy Asthma Immunol. 14, 37–47. - PubMed

Publication types