Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jan;62(1):56-61.
doi: 10.1111/ijd.16515. Epub 2022 Nov 28.

Cost evaluation of the Merlin assay for predicting melanoma sentinel lymph node biopsy metastasis

Affiliations

Cost evaluation of the Merlin assay for predicting melanoma sentinel lymph node biopsy metastasis

Viengneesee Thao et al. Int J Dermatol. 2023 Jan.

Abstract

Background: The Merlin assay for melanoma-risk assessment has become commercially available to reduce the rate of unnecessary sentinel lymph node biopsies (SLNB) in SLNB-eligible patients with cutaneous melanoma. Merlin low-risk patients are recommended to undergo wide local excision (WLE) of the primary tumor, whereas Merlin high-risk patients are recommended to undergo both SLNB and WLE. Here, we compared the cost of a Merlin testing strategy to that of a no-testing strategy (usual care) before prescribing SLNB.

Methods: We identified T1 and T2 patients who underwent WLE and SLNB but not completion lymph node dissection between 2007 and 2018. Controls were T1 patients who only underwent WLE. Costs for WLE and SLNB were calculated by converting institutional cost data to standardized Medicare reimbursement rates. We then developed a decision tree to compare the cost of Merlin testing to that of a no-testing strategy (usual care).

Results: The average standardized cost of WLE was $2066, whereas the cost of WLE and SLNB was $11,976 based on Medicare rates. At a cost below $7350 for T1b melanoma and $4600 for T1b to T2 melanoma, Merlin testing was cost-saving compared to a no-testing strategy (usual care), assuming Medicare reimbursement rates.

Conclusion: Merlin testing for T1b and T2 melanoma is potentially cost saving depending on the cost of the molecular assay and SLNB reimbursement rates. In addition to being cost saving, Merlin is expected to improve health-related quality of life.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Decision tree model. SLNB, sentinel lymph node biopsy; WLE, wide local excision

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Gershenwald JE, Scolyer RA, Hess KR, Sondak VK, Long GV, Ross MI, et al. Melanoma staging: evidence‐based changes in the American Joint Committee on Cancer eighth edition cancer staging manual. CA Cancer J Clin. 2017;67:472–92. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Welch HG, Mazer BL, Adamson AS. The rapid rise in cutaneous melanoma diagnoses. N Engl J Med. 2021;384:72–9. - PubMed
    1. Weitemeyer MB, Helvind NM, Brinck AM, Hölmich LR, Chakera AH. More sentinel lymph node biopsies for thin melanomas after transition to AJCC 8th edition do not increase positivity rate: a Danish population‐based study of 7148 patients. J Surg Oncol. 2022;125:498–508. - PubMed
    1. Swetter SM, Thompson JA, Albertini MR, Barker CA, Baumgartner J, Boland G, et al. NCCN Guidelines® Insights: Melanoma: Cutaneous, Version 2.2021: featured updates to the NCCN guidelines. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw. 2021;19:364–76. - PubMed
    1. Luke JJ, Rutkowski P, Queirolo P, del Vecchio M, Mackiewicz J, Chiarion‐Sileni V, et al. Pembrolizumab versus placebo as adjuvant therapy in completely resected stage IIB or IIC melanoma (KEYNOTE‐716): a randomised, double‐blind, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2022;399:1718–29. - PubMed

Substances