Confocal laser microscopy for assessment of surgical margins during radical prostatectomy
- PMID: 36440864
- DOI: 10.1111/bju.15938
Confocal laser microscopy for assessment of surgical margins during radical prostatectomy
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the feasibility of confocal laser microscopy (CLM) for intraoperative margin assessment as faster alternative to neurovascular structure-adjacent frozen-section examination (NeuroSAFE) during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP).
Patients and methods: Surgical margins were assessed during 50 RARP procedures in patients scheduled for NeuroSAFE. Posterolateral sections were cut and imaged with CLM and further processed to conform with the NeuroSAFE protocol. Secondary resection (SR) was performed in case a positive surgical margin (PSM) was observed with NeuroSAFE. Afterwards, the CLM images were non-blinded assessed for the presence of PSMs. The accuracy of both NeuroSAFE and CLM was compared with conventional histopathology. Agreement for detection of PSMs between NeuroSAFE and CLM was evaluated with Cohen's kappa coefficient. Procedure times were compared with a Wilcoxon signed-ranks test.
Results: In total, 96 posterolateral sections of RP specimens were evaluated for the presence of PSMs. CLM identified 15 (16%) PSMs and NeuroSAFE identified 14 (15%) PSMs. CLM had a calculated sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of 86%, 96%, 80% and 98% respectively for the detection of PSMs compared to definite pathology. After SR, residual tumour was found in six of 13 cases (46%), which were all identified by both techniques. There was a substantial level of agreement between CLM and NeuroSAFE (κ = 0.80). The median procedure time for CLM was significantly shorter compared to NeuroSAFE (8 vs 50 min, P < 0.001). The main limitation of this study was the non-blinded assessment of the CLM images.
Conclusions: Compared to NeuroSAFE, CLM is a promising technique for intraoperative margin assessment and is able to reduce the time of intraoperative margin assessment.
Keywords: #PCSM; #ProstateCancer; #uroonc; NeuroSAFE; confocal laser microscopy; digital imaging; frozen section; prostate cancer; radical prostatectomy; surgical margins.
© 2022 BJU International.
References
-
- Arroyo C, Martini A, Wang J, Tewari AK. Anatomical, surgical and technical factors influencing continence after radical prostatectomy. Ther Adv Urol 2019; 11: 175628721881378
-
- Tal R, Alphs HH, Krebs P, Nelson CJ, Mulhall JP. Erectile function recovery rate after radical prostatectomy: a meta-analysis. J Sex Med 2009; 6: 2538-46
-
- Vernooij RWM, Cremers RGHM, Jansen H et al. Urinary incontinence and erectile dysfunction in patients with localized or locally advanced prostate cancer: a nationwide observational study. Urol Oncol Semin Orig Investig 2020; 38: 735.e17-735.e25
-
- Mottet N, van den Bergh RCN, Briers E et al. EAU-EANM-ESTRO-ESUR-SIOG guidelines on prostate cancer-2020 update. Part 1: screening, diagnosis, and local treatment with curative intent. Eur Urol 2021; 79: 243-62
-
- Soeterik TFW, van Melick HHE, Dijksman LM, Stomps S, Witjes JA, van Basten JPA. Nerve sparing during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy increases the risk of ipsilateral positive surgical margins. J Urol 2020; 204: 91-5
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous
