Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Nov 28;11(11):e42331.
doi: 10.2196/42331.

The Differences Between Same-Day and Staged (Circumferential) Fusion Surgery in Adult Spinal Deformity: Protocol for a Systematic Review

Affiliations

The Differences Between Same-Day and Staged (Circumferential) Fusion Surgery in Adult Spinal Deformity: Protocol for a Systematic Review

Mert Marcel Dagli et al. JMIR Res Protoc. .

Abstract

Background: Adult spinal deformity (ASD) is a deformity in the curvature of the adult spine. ASD includes a range of pathology that leads to decreased quality of life for patients as well as debilitating morbidities. Treatment can range from nonoperative management to long-segment surgical corrections and depends greatly on the deformity and patient profiles. If surgical treatment is indicated, circumferential (a combined anterior and posterior approach) fusion is one of the tools in the spine surgeon's armamentarium. Depending on the complexity, the procedure is either completed on the same day or staged. Determining whether to perform a circumferential surgery in a staged fashion is based largely on the surgeon's preference and perception of the individual case complexity; at present, there is no high-quality evidence that can be used to support that decision.

Objective: This paper presents the protocol for a systematic review that aims to investigate the differences between same-day versus staged circumferential fusion surgery in ASD both in patient selection and in outcomes.

Methods: Searches will be performed on MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, and Scopus. Gray literature and the reference lists of articles included in the full-text screening will also be screened for inclusion. Results will be exported to Covidence. Data will be collected on demographics, type of procedures performed, surgery levels, blood loss, total operation time, length of stay, disposition, readmissions (30 days and 90 days), and perioperative complications. Patient-reported outcomes will also be assessed. Data quality assessment of randomized controlled trials will be performed using the Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomized trials, and nonrandomized studies will be assessed with the ROBINS-I (Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies of Interventions) tool. All screening, quality assessment, and data extraction will be done by 2 independent reviewers. A descriptive synthesis will be performed, and data will be evaluated for further analysis.

Results: This study is currently in the screening phase. There are no results yet. The search strategy has been developed and documented. Information has been exported to Covidence. Upon conclusion of the critical appraisal stage, screening and extraction, as well as a synthesis of the results, will be performed.

Conclusions: The intended review will summarize the differences in perioperative outcomes and complications between same-day and staged (circumferential) fusion surgery in adult spinal deformity. It will also describe the patients selected for such procedures based on their demographics and pathology. Identified gaps in knowledge will provide insight into current limitations and guide further studies on this topic.

Trial registration: PROSPERO CRD42022339764; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=339764.

International registered report identifier (irrid): PRR1-10.2196/42331.

Keywords: adult spinal deformity; circumferential; differences; fusion; fusion surgery; kyphosis; perioperative; protocol; review methodology; scoliosis; search strategy; spinal curvature; spinal deformity; spinal surgery; spine deformity; surgery; surgical; systematic review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Kim HJ, Yang JH, Chang D, Suk S, Suh SW, Song K, Park J, Cho W. Adult spinal deformity: current concepts and decision-making strategies for management. Asian Spine J. 2020 Dec;14(6):886–897. doi: 10.31616/asj.2020.0568. http://asianspinejournal.org/journal/view.php?doi=10.31616/asj.2020.0568 asj.2020.0568 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Diebo BG, Varghese JJ, Lafage R, Schwab FJ, Lafage V. Sagittal alignment of the spine: what do you need to know? Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2015 Dec;139:295–301. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2015.10.024.S0303-8467(15)30055-X - DOI - PubMed
    1. Glassman SD, Bridwell K, Dimar JR, Horton W, Berven S, Schwab F. The impact of positive sagittal balance in adult spinal deformity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2005 Sep 15;30(18):2024–9. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000179086.30449.96.00007632-200509150-00005 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Illés Tamás S, Lavaste F, Dubousset JF. The third dimension of scoliosis: the forgotten axial plane. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2019 Apr;105(2):351–359. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2018.10.021. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1877-0568(18)30388-8 S1877-0568(18)30388-8 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bradford DS, Tay BK, Hu SS. Adult scoliosis: surgical indications, operative management, complications, and outcomes. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1999 Dec 15;24(24):2617–29. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199912150-00009. - DOI - PubMed