Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Nov 28;12(1):20473.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-24649-w.

Ectopic pregnancy risk factors in infertile patients: a 10-year single center experience

Affiliations

Ectopic pregnancy risk factors in infertile patients: a 10-year single center experience

Federico Cirillo et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

The present retrospective study included both intrauterine insemination and in vitro assisted reproductive technologies (ART) procedures performed from January 2009 to December 2018 at a tertiary-care Fertility Centre. The purpose was to assess the incidence of ectopic pregnancy (EP) in infertile population who undergoes ART and to identify any risk factor impacting the occurrence of EP after ART. Among 27,376 cycles, 7352 pregnancies were achieved, of which 132 were EPs, the 1.80% (95% CI 1.5-2.1) of all pregnancies. In fresh embryo transfer cycles, a history of prior pelvic adhesions showed the greatest impact on the incidence of EP (aOR 2.49 95% CI 1.53-4.07 p < 0.001). Other factors associated with EP incidence were also identified, such as female age, basal FSH, the transfer of blastocyst embryos and difficulties during the embryo transfer procedure. In frozen embryo transfer cycles, the only factor influencing the incidence of EP was anti Müllerian hormone (AMH) serum concentration (aOR 0.81 95% CI 0.65-1.00, p = 0.048). To conclude, the incidence of EP observed was comparable to that reported after natural conception. On the other hand, pre-existing risk factors, traditionally more common in infertile population, appeared to influence the incidence of EP and should thus be modified if possible.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study flowchart.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Marion LL, Meeks GR. Ectopic pregnancy: History, incidence, epidemiology, and risk factors. Clin. Obstet. Gynecol. 2012;55(2):376–386. doi: 10.1097/GRF.0b013e3182516d7b. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Khan KS, Wojdyla D, Say L, Gülmezoglu AM, Van Look PF. WHO analysis of causes of maternal death: A systematic review. Lancet. 2006;367(9516):1066–1074. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68397-9. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dialani V, Levine D. Ectopic pregnancy: A review. Ultrasound Q. 2004;20(3):105–117. doi: 10.1097/00013644-200409000-00005. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hortu İ, A. L., Akdemir, A., Ergenoğlu, M., Yeniel, Ö. & Şendağ, F. Management of ectopic pregnancy in unusual location: Five-year experience in a single center. J. Clin. Exp. Investig.8(3), 90–95 (2017).
    1. Acet F, Goker ENT, Hortu I, Sahin G, Tavmergen E. A rare case of bilateral tubal ectopic pregnancy following intracytoplasmic sperm injection-embryo transfer (ICSI-ET) Rev. Bras. Ginecol. Obstet. 2020;42(3):165–168. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1708093. - DOI - PMC - PubMed