Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Nov 28;32(Suppl 4):iv101-iv106.
doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckac069.

Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans: implementation process and indicators to evaluate effects on physical activity

Affiliations

Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans: implementation process and indicators to evaluate effects on physical activity

Romanika Okraszewska et al. Eur J Public Health. .

Abstract

Background: Active mobility and public transport increase physical activity (PA) levels. With varying intensity and effectiveness, European cities implement Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans (SUMPs) to spur transport-related PA. Therefore, we aim to examine drivers and barriers to SUMP implementation and assess its influence on PA across European cities.

Methods: We screened policy reports to gain insights into SUMP implementation in one Danish, two German and two Polish cities. Further, we conducted semi-structured interviews with SUMP stakeholders in these cities to explore their experiences with SUMP implementation. Thematic analysis of interview transcripts was applied to identify similarities and differences across cities. To assess the effect of SUMP implementation on PA, we searched for data on indicators of transport-related PA.

Results: All investigated cities are committed to sustainable mobility. Nonetheless, complex institutional structures, the dominant role of motorized traffic as well as complex regional and local policy integration hamper SUMP implementation. Danish, German and Polish cities face different contexts in terms of financing, national guidelines and the prominence of sustainability as a policy objective. Each city adopts unique indicators for monitoring the effects of SUMPs on transport-related PA. The variety of indicators and limited data availability impede a comparative evaluation across cities. Constrained by this restriction, we identified motorization rate, modal split and public transport ridership as suitable indicators.

Conclusions: Local idiosyncrasies need to be accounted for when assessing the implementation of SUMPs. Nonetheless, consistent indicators and data transparency are essential for comparing the effectiveness of SUMPs and their impact on PA.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Bull FC, Bauman AE.. Physical inactivity: the “Cinderella” risk factor for noncommunicable disease prevention. J Health Commun 2011;16:13–26. - PubMed
    1. WHO. Global Recommendations on Physical Activity for Health [Internet]. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization, 2010. Available at: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/44399/9789241599979_eng.... - PubMed
    1. Frank LD. Land use and transportation interaction: implications on public health and quality of life. J Plan Educ Res 2000;20:6–22.
    1. Chakrabarti S, Shin EJ.. Automobile dependence and physical inactivity: insights from the California Household Travel Survey. J Transp Health 2017;6:262–71.
    1. Rissel C, Curac N, Greenaway M, Bauman A.. Physical activity associated with public transport use—A review and modelling of potential benefits. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2012;9:2454–78. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types