Validation of the Thai Version of the Memorial Symptom Assessment Scaled - Short Form Among Cholangiocarcinoma Patients
- PMID: 36444598
- PMCID: PMC9930977
- DOI: 10.31557/APJCP.2022.23.11.3851
Validation of the Thai Version of the Memorial Symptom Assessment Scaled - Short Form Among Cholangiocarcinoma Patients
Abstract
Background: The Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale-Short Form (MSAS-SF), a standard instrument for assessing cancer patients' symptoms, has been validated in numerous languages. However, it has not been validated in Thai.
Objectives: The purpose of this study was to translate the MSAS-SF into Thai and determine its psychometric properties in Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) patients.
Methods: The MSAS-SF was translated into Thai, and 231 CCA patients completed the questionnaires, which included baseline characteristics, T-MSAS-SF, Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Hepatobiliary (FACT-Hep), and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Cronbach's alpha coefficient was used to assess reliability for internal consistency. For convergent validity, Pearson's correlation coefficient was used to calculate the relationship between the T-MSAS-SF and the T-CaSUN, HADS, and FACT-Hep subscales.
Results: Subscale and total T-MSAS-SF internal consistency reliability was moderately high, with Cronbach alpha coefficients ranging from 0.76 to 0.87. For convergent validity, the majority of T-MSAS-SF scores had moderate to low inverse correlation with FACT-Hep, HADS T-CaSUN subscales with the correlation coefficients-0.10 to -0.68 (p<0.05), reflecting that they were measuring a similar construct.
Conclusion: Our findings showed that the T-MSAS-SF has acceptable validity and reliability to assess the psychometric properties of early to advance stage CCA patients during treatment and early post-treatment stage.
Keywords: MSAS-SF; Symptom assessment; Thai; Validation; cholangiocarcinoma.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.
References
-
- Chang VT, Hwang Ss Fau - Feuerman M, Feuerman M Fau - Kasimis BS, et al. The memorial symptom assessment scale short form (MSAS-SF) Cancer. 2000;89:1162–71. - PubMed
-
- Chinda M, Jaturapatporn D, Kirshen AJ, et al. Reliability and validity of a Thai version of the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS-Thai) J Pain Symptom Manag. 2011;42:954–60. - PubMed
-
- Cleeland CS. Symptom burden: multiple symptoms and their impact as patient- reported outcomes. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2007;2007:16–21. - PubMed
-
- Dapueto JJ, del Carmen Abreu M, Francolino C, et al. Psychometric assessment of the MSAS-SF and the FACIT-Fatigue Scale in Spanish-speaking patients with cancer in Uruguay. J Pain Symptom Manag. 2014;47:936–45. - PubMed
-
- DeVon HA, Block ME, Moyle-Wright P, et al. A psychometric toolbox for testing validity and reliability. J Nurs Scholarship. 2007;39:155–64. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
