Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Feb 1:327:116874.
doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116874. Epub 2022 Nov 26.

Effects of EU illegal logging policy on timber-supplying countries: A systematic review

Affiliations

Effects of EU illegal logging policy on timber-supplying countries: A systematic review

Fredy D Polo Villanueva et al. J Environ Manage. .

Abstract

The EU's Forest Law Enforcement, Governance and Trade Action Plan (FLEGT) adopted in 2003 includes bilateral trade agreements known as Voluntary Partnership Agreements (VPAs) signed between the EU and timber-supplying countries. The EU has invested more than 1.5 billion euros in VPAs; however, only one of the seven concerned countries has managed to complete all the necessary requirements to expire FLEGT licences. Since there is no research that comprehensively integrates the scientific evidence regarding the effects of this policy, this study systematically reviews all empirical scientific studies on the effects of VPAs. We found that almost all relevant studies are case reports that use qualitative data and focus on only one country at a time, mainly Ghana, Cameroon, or Indonesia. The evidence suggests that while VPAs have contributed to the establishment of governance structures, tools, and procedures they have not been able to solve social problems (i.e., inequality and injustice) and have potentially harmed the economies of EU timber suppliers. Evidence on the effects of VPAs on illegal logging and trade and the environment remains limited. Thus, future research should focus on more countries; use a greater range of methods, including comparative experimental designs; explore possible intended effects on under-researched categories; and systematically investigate unintended effects on other categories within and outside the forestry sector.

Keywords: EU Trade policy; Forest governance; International forest policy; International regime; Regime effectiveness; Timber legality.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests:Fredy D. Polo Villanueva, Yitagesu T. Tegegne, Georg Winkel, and Lukas Giessen report an employment relationship with the European Forest Institute (EFI) at the beginning of the study. However, Polo, Winkel and Giessen changed to other institutions at the time the study was submitted for review. Tegegne is current senior staff at EFI. Although these employment binds were and are with the scientific branch of the EFI, it is important to state that this institution has another branch, called EFI FLEGT Facility, which support the negotiation and implementation of the VPAs. Furthermore, unlike in previous cases, the other co-authors have had no affiliation with EFI either when they participated in the co-design of this study or when they contributed to the final version of the manuscript.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources