Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Nov 29;12(1):20598.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-17991-6.

Organic manures and inorganic fertilizers effects on soil properties and economic analysis under cassava cultivation in the southern Cameroon

Affiliations

Organic manures and inorganic fertilizers effects on soil properties and economic analysis under cassava cultivation in the southern Cameroon

Eloi Gervais Bilong et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

Cassava cultivation causes serious soil fertility depletion in southern Cameroon due to high mining of soil nutrients by the crop. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of Tithonia diversifolia fresh biomass (TB), poultry manure (PM) and inorganic fertilizers (IF) on soil properties, cassava yield, and the economic returns. The treatments consisted of two rates of TB (10 and 20 t ha-1), two rates of PM (10 and 20 t ha-1), two rates of combined TB and PM (5 and 10 t ha-1), a single rate of inorganic fertilizers (100 N:22P:83 K kg ha-1) and a control. The results showed that soil properties, soil quality index and cassava yield were significantly improved by the application of the organic manures. Tithonia diversifolia fresh biomass (TB) and poultry manure (PM) lowered the soil bulk density, increased soil total porosity, water holding capacity and chemical properties. TB and PM, solely or mixed, improved the aerial dry biomass (ADB) and fresh tuber yield (FTY) of cassava. The organic manures performed better than inorganic fertilizer. The highest yield (51 and 52 t ha-1 of fresh tubers) was obtained with the mixture of TB and PM applied at 10 t ha-1 each for the successive years. Positive and significant correlation was found between SQI and cassava yield. TB and PM combined at 10 t ha-1 each was the most profitable and cost-effective treatment, with a good benefit:cost ratio of 3.2:1 and net return of FCFA 3.736.900 ha-1. Thus, the use of Tithonia diversifolia fresh biomass and poultry manure is a sustainable method for cassava production in the southern Cameroon.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Means of soil chemical properties in 2016/2017 and 2017/2018 cropping seasons. T0 = control (no amendement), T1 = IF : 13-13-23 NPK at 450 t ha−1 + urea at 100 t ha−1, T2 = TB at 20 t ha−1, T3 = TB at 10 t ha−1, T4 = PM at 20 t ha−1, T5 = PM at 10 t ha−1, T6 = TB at 10 t ha−1 + PM at 10 t ha−1, T7 = TB at 5 t ha−1 + PM at 5 t ha−1. TMTithonia diversifolia fresh biomass, PM poultry manure, IF inorganic fertilizer. Values followed by similar letters are not significantly different at p = 0.05.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Means of aerial dry biomass (a) and fresh tuber yield (b) of cassava in 2016/2017 and 2017/2018 cropping seasons. T0 = control (no amendement), T1 = IF : 13-13-23 NPK at 450 t ha−1 + Urea at 100 t ha−1, T2 = TB at 20 t ha−1, T3 = TB at 10 t ha−1, T4 = PM at 20 t ha−1, T5 = PM at 10 t ha−1, T6 = TB at 10 t ha−1 + PM at 10 t ha−1, T7 = TB at 5 t ha−1 + PM at 5 t ha−1. TMTithonia diversifolia fresh biomass, PM poultry manure, IF inorganic fertilizer. Values followed by similar letters are not significantly different at p = 0.05.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Variation in soil quality index (SQI) under different treatments in the 2016/2017 and 2017/2018 cropping seasons. T0 = control (no amendement), T1 = IF : 13-13-23 NPK at 450 t ha−1 + urea at 100 t ha−1, T2 = TB at 20 t ha−1, T3 = TB at 10 t ha−1, T4 = PM at 20 t ha−1, T5 = PM at 10 t ha−1, T6 = TB at 10 t ha−1 + PM at 10 t ha−1, T7 = TB at 5 t ha−1 + PM at 5 t ha−1. TMTithonia diversifolia fresh biomass, PM poultry manure, IF inorganic fertilizer. Values followed by similar letters are not significantly different at p = 0.05.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Relationships between Soil Quality Index (SQI) values and cassava yield in the 2016/2017 and 2017/2018 cropping seasons.

References

    1. Mbanjo EGN, Rabbi IY, Ferguson ME, et al. Technological innovations for improving cassava production in Sub-Saharan Africa. Front. Genet. 2021 doi: 10.3389/fgene.2020.623736. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Njukwe, E., Onadipe, O., Amadou-Thierno, D., Hanna, R., Kirscht, H., Maziya-Dixon, B., Araki, S., Mbiaronodji, A. & Ngue-Bissa, T. Cassava processing among small-holder farmers in Cameroon: opportunities and challenges. Int. J. Agricult. Policy Res.2(4), 113–112. http://www.journalissues.org/ijapr (2014).
    1. Howeler, R.H, Lutaladio, N. & Thomas, G. Save and Grow: Cassava: A Guide toSustainable Production Intensification, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Rome, Italy (2013).
    1. Nassar N, Ortiz R. Elever du manioc pour nourrir les pauvres. Sci. Am. 2010;302:78–85. doi: 10.1002/9781118060995.ch3. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Githunguri, C.M. & Njiru, E.N. Role of cassava and sweetpotato in mitigating drought in semi-arid Makueni County in Kenya. in African Handbook of Climate Change Adaptation (Leal Filho, W., Oguge, N., Ayal, D., Adeleke, L., da Silva, I. eds.). 10.1007/978-3-030-45106-6_11 (Springer, 2021).