Machine-learning-derived sepsis bundle of care
- PMID: 36446854
- DOI: 10.1007/s00134-022-06928-2
Machine-learning-derived sepsis bundle of care
Abstract
Purpose: Compliance to the Surviving Sepsis Campaign (SSC) guidelines is limited. This is known to be associated with increased mortality. The aim of this retrospective cohort study was to identify among the SCC guidelines the optimal bundle of recommendations that minimize 28-day mortality.
Methods: We used a training cohort to identify, using a least absolute shrinkage and selection operator penalized machine learning model, this bundle. Patients with sepsis/septic shock admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) were extracted from two US databases, the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care-IV (MIMIC-IV) database (training and internal validation cohorts) and the eICU Collaborative Research Database (eICU-CRD) (external validation cohort). In the validation cohorts, we defined a bundle group that includes patients who were treated with at least all the recommendations selected in our bundle and a no-bundle group that includes patients in whom at least one recommendation from our bundle was omitted.
Results: All-cause 28-day mortality was the primary outcome measure. A total of 42,735 patients were included. Six recommendations (antimicrobials, balanced crystalloid, insulin therapy, corticosteroids, vasopressin, and bicarbonate therapy) were identified from the training cohort to be included in our bundle. In the propensity score-(PS)-matched internal validation cohort, the bundle group was associated with a lower mortality (OR 0.41 [0.33-0.53]; p < 0.001) compared to the no-bundle group. This was confirmed in the PS-matched external validation cohort (OR 0.75 [0.60-0.94]; p 0.02).
Conclusion: Our bundle of six recommendations is associated with a dramatic reduction in mortality in sepsis and septic shock. This bundle needs to be evaluated prospectively.
Keywords: Compliance; Guidelines; Machine learning; Sepsis; Septic shock.
© 2022. Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
Comment in
-
Database-based machine learning in sepsis deserves attention.Intensive Care Med. 2023 Feb;49(2):262-263. doi: 10.1007/s00134-022-06961-1. Epub 2023 Jan 2. Intensive Care Med. 2023. PMID: 36592206 No abstract available.
References
-
- Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, Shankar-Hari M, Annane D, Bauer M et al (2016) The third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA 315(8):801–810 - DOI
-
- Fleischmann-Struzek C, Mellhammar L, Rose N, Cassini A, Rudd KE, Schlattmann P et al (2020) Incidence and mortality of hospital- and ICU-treated sepsis: results from an updated and expanded systematic review and meta-analysis. Intensive Care Med 46(8):1552–1562 - DOI
-
- Angus DC, van der Poll T (2013) Severe sepsis and septic shock. N Engl J Med 369(9):840–851 - DOI
-
- Gaieski DF, Edwards JM, Kallan MJ, Carr BG (2013) Benchmarking the incidence and mortality of severe sepsis in the United States. Crit Care Med 41(5):1167–1174 - DOI
-
- Evans L, Rhodes A, Alhazzani W, Antonelli M, Coopersmith CM, French C et al (2021) Executive summary: surviving sepsis campaign: International Guidelines for the Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2021. Crit Care Med 49(11):1974–1982 - DOI
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials