The predictive ability of routinely collected laboratory markers for surgically treated spinal metastases: a retrospective single institution study
- PMID: 36447178
- PMCID: PMC9706860
- DOI: 10.1186/s12885-022-10334-8
The predictive ability of routinely collected laboratory markers for surgically treated spinal metastases: a retrospective single institution study
Abstract
Purpose: We aimed to identify effective routinely collected laboratory biomarkers for predicting postoperative outcomes in surgically treated spinal metastases and attempted to establish an effective prediction model.
Methods: This study included 268 patients with spinal metastases surgically treated at a single institution. We evaluated patient laboratory biomarkers to determine trends to predict survival. The markers included white blood cell (WBC) count, platelet count, neutrophil count, lymphocyte count, hemoglobin, albumin, alkaline phosphatase, creatinine, total bilirubin, calcium, international normalized ratio (INR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR). A nomogram based on laboratory markers was established to predict postoperative 90-day and 1-year survival. The discrimination and calibration were validated using concordance index (C-index), area under curves (AUC) from receiver operating characteristic curves, and calibration curves. Another 47 patients were used as a validation group to test the accuracy of the nomogram. The prediction accuracy of the nomogram was compared to Tomita, revised Tokuhashi, modified Bauer, and Skeletal Oncology Research Group machine-learning (SORG ML).
Results: WBC, lymphocyte count, albumin, and creatinine were shown to be the independent prognostic factors. The four predictive laboratory markers and primary tumor, were incorporated into the nomogram to predict the 90-day and 1-year survival probability. The nomogram performed good with a C-index of 0.706 (0.702-0.710). For predicting 90-day survival, the AUC in the training group and the validation group was 0.740 (0.660-0.819) and 0.795 (0.568-1.000), respectively. For predicting 1-year survival, the AUC in the training group and the validation group was 0.765 (0.709-0.822) and 0.712 (0.547-0.877), respectively. Our nomogram seems to have better predictive accuracy than Tomita, revised Tokuhashi, and modified Bauer, alongside comparable prediction ability to SORG ML.
Conclusions: Our study confirmed that routinely collected laboratory markers are closely associated with the prognosis of spinal metastases. A nomogram based on primary tumor, WBC, lymphocyte count, albumin, and creatinine, could accurately predict postoperative survival for patients with spinal metastases.
Keywords: Spine metastases; laboratory markers; nomogram; prognosis; survival.
© 2022. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Figures








Similar articles
-
Predicting survival for metastatic spine disease: a comparison of nine scoring systems.Spine J. 2018 Oct;18(10):1804-1814. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2018.03.011. Epub 2018 Mar 19. Spine J. 2018. PMID: 29567516
-
Predicting survival outcomes in renal cell carcinoma spinal metastases: a multicenter evaluation of existing prognostic systems.Spine J. 2025 May 8:S1529-9430(25)00252-9. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2025.05.025. Online ahead of print. Spine J. 2025. PMID: 40348282
-
Evaluation of different scoring systems for spinal metastases based on a Chinese cohort.Cancer Med. 2023 Feb;12(4):4125-4136. doi: 10.1002/cam4.5272. Epub 2022 Sep 21. Cancer Med. 2023. PMID: 36128836 Free PMC article.
-
Prognostic significance of lab data and performance comparison by validating survival prediction models for patients with spinal metastases after radiotherapy.Radiother Oncol. 2022 Oct;175:159-166. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2022.08.029. Epub 2022 Sep 5. Radiother Oncol. 2022. PMID: 36067909
-
To operate, or not to operate? Narrative review of the role of survival predictors in patient selection for operative management of patients with metastatic spine disease.J Neurosurg Spine. 2020 Sep 11;34(1):135-149. doi: 10.3171/2020.6.SPINE20707. Print 2021 Jan 1. J Neurosurg Spine. 2020. PMID: 32916652 Review.
Cited by
-
Artificial Intelligence Models for Predicting Outcomes in Spinal Metastasis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.J Clin Med. 2025 Aug 20;14(16):5885. doi: 10.3390/jcm14165885. J Clin Med. 2025. PMID: 40869712 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Fehlings MG, Nater A, Tetreault L, Kopjar B, Arnold P, Dekutoski M, et al. Survival and Clinical Outcomes in Surgically Treated Patients With Metastatic Epidural Spinal Cord Compression: Results of the Prospective Multicenter AOSpine Study. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34:268–276. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.61.9338. - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources