Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Nov 29;22(1):314.
doi: 10.1186/s12911-022-02063-6.

Electrocardiogram lead conversion from single-lead blindly-segmented signals

Affiliations
Review

Electrocardiogram lead conversion from single-lead blindly-segmented signals

Sofia C Beco et al. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. .

Abstract

Background: The standard configuration's set of twelve electrocardiogram (ECG) leads is optimal for the medical diagnosis of diverse cardiac conditions. However, it requires ten electrodes on the patient's limbs and chest, which is uncomfortable and cumbersome. Interlead conversion methods can reconstruct missing leads and enable more comfortable acquisitions, including in wearable devices, while still allowing for adequate diagnoses. Currently, methodologies for interlead ECG conversion either require multiple reference (input) leads and/or require input signals to be temporally aligned considering the ECG landmarks.

Methods: Unlike the methods in the literature, this paper studies the possibility of converting ECG signals into all twelve standard configuration leads using signal segments from only one reference lead, without temporal alignment (blindly-segmented). The proposed methodology is based on a deep learning encoder-decoder U-Net architecture, which is compared with adaptations based on convolutional autoencoders and label refinement networks. Moreover, the method is explored for conversion with one single shared encoder or multiple individual encoders for each lead.

Results: Despite the more challenging settings, the proposed methodology was able to attain state-of-the-art level performance in multiple target leads, and both lead I and lead II seem especially suitable to convert certain sets of leads. In cross-database tests, the methodology offered promising results despite acquisition setup differences. Furthermore, results show that the presence of medical conditions does not have a considerable effect on the method's performance.

Conclusions: This study shows the feasibility of converting ECG signals using single-lead blindly-segmented inputs. Although the results are promising, further efforts should be devoted towards the improvement of the methodologies, especially the robustness to diverse acquisition setups, in order to be applicable to cardiac health monitoring in wearable devices and less obtrusive clinical scenarios.

Keywords: Autoencoder; Conversion; Deep learning; Electrocardiogram (ECG); Leads; U-Net.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Illustration of a sample ECG heartbeat with its characteristic waveforms
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Simple schema of the proposed method, which receives single-lead ECG signals and delivers reconstructed 12-lead signals to be used for diagnosis or other purposes
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Overview schema of the main U-Net architecture used in this work for lead conversion
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Overview schema of the convolutional autoencoder (AE) architecture
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Overview schema of the architecture based on label refinement networks (LRN)
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Example result of lead II to all conversion on the PTB test dataset (each row depicts one converted lead, with the shared encoder on the left column and individual encoders in the right column; the horizontal axis represents time, while the vertical axis corresponds to the normalised signal amplitude)
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
Example result of lead I to all conversion on the PTB test dataset (each row depicts one converted lead, with the shared encoder on the left column and individual encoders in the right column; the horizontal axis represents time, while the vertical axis corresponds to the normalised signal amplitude)

References

    1. Pinto JR, Cardoso JS, Lourenço A. Evolution, current challenges, and future possibilities in ECG biometrics. IEEE Access. 2018;6:34746–34776. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2849870. - DOI
    1. dos Santos Silva I, Barbosa JR, de Sousa RD, de Souza IFB, de Aguiar Hortegal R, Regis CDM. Comparison of spatial temporal representations of the vectorcardiogram using digital image processing. J Electrocardiol. 2020;59:164–170. doi: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2020.02.013. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sohn J, Yang S, Lee J, Ku Y, Kim HC. Reconstruction of 12-lead electrocardiogram from a three-lead patch-type device using a LSTM network. Sensors. 2020;20(11):3278. doi: 10.3390/s20113278. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lee J-E, Oh K-T, Kim B, Yoo SK. Synthesis of electrocardiogram V-lead signals from limb-lead measurement using R-peak aligned generative adversarial network. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2020;24(5):1265–1275. doi: 10.1109/JBHI.2019.2936583. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Matyschik M, Mauranen H, Bonizzi P, Karel J. Feasibility of ECG reconstruction from minimal lead sets using convolutional neural networks. In: Computing in Cardiology 2020.

Publication types