An Evaluation of The Diagnostic Value of Sputum Smears Microscopy and Pcr Relative to Sputum Culture in The Diagnosis of Pulmonary Tuberculosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis in Iran
- PMID: 36447544
- PMCID: PMC9700423
- DOI: 10.47176/mjiri.36.112
An Evaluation of The Diagnostic Value of Sputum Smears Microscopy and Pcr Relative to Sputum Culture in The Diagnosis of Pulmonary Tuberculosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis in Iran
Abstract
Background: Tuberculosis is one of the oldest known diseases in humans, and early detection of tuberculosis is one of the main measures to decrease the spread of tuberculosis. In many parts of the world, including Iran, the diagnosis of tuberculosis is based on the detection of acid-fast bacillus in sputum smear microscopy and PCR. this study aimed to synthesize evidence on the diagnostic accuracy of sputum smear and PCR compared to sputum culture for the diagnosis of PT in Iranian patients. Methods: This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted based on PRISMA guideline for systematic review and meta-analysis. Eligible studies were cross-sectional original diagnostic studies published in English and Persian in Iran which examined the sensitivity or specificity(study outcome) of sputum smear microscopy or PCR( as the test) relative to sputum culture (as the gold standard/comparator) among Iranian patients suspected of having tuberculosis( study population). Studies whose data were not complete or extractable were excluded. Results: A total of 3518 subjects were evaluated from 15 eligible studies. The pooled sensitivity of sputum smear and PCR was 75.12 (95% CI: 66.68-83.56) and 88.02 (95% CI: 82.87-93.27), respectively. The specificity for sputum smear and PCR was 93.94 (95% CI: 91.26-96.63) and 91.82 (95% CI: 87.29-96.35) respectively. The sensitivity of both sputum smears was higher in studies published after 2010, and had higher quality. The specificity of sputum smear was a bit lower in studies published after2010 but higher in studies with higher quality. The specificity of PCR was higher in studies published after 2010 but higher in studies with higher quality. Conclusion:The increased sensitivity of sputum smear and PCR during recent years suggests the improvement of preparation and laboratory methods in recent years. However, the imperfect sensitivity of these tests highlights the need for a more accurate diagnostic method for the detection of pulmonary tuberculosis in Iran.
Keywords: Iran; Meta-Analysis; Mycobacterium tuberculosis; Polymerase Chain Reaction; Sputum Culture; Sputum Smear.
© 2022 Iran University of Medical Sciences.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Similar articles
-
Shortening Isolation of Patients With Suspected Tuberculosis by Using Polymerase Chain Reaction Analysis: A Nationwide Cross-sectional Study.Clin Infect Dis. 2015 Nov 1;61(9):1365-73. doi: 10.1093/cid/civ563. Epub 2015 Jul 14. Clin Infect Dis. 2015. PMID: 26175524
-
Direct microscopy versus sputum cytology analysis and bleach sedimentation for diagnosis of tuberculosis: a prospective diagnostic study.BMC Infect Dis. 2010 Sep 21;10:276. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-10-276. BMC Infect Dis. 2010. PMID: 20858253 Free PMC article.
-
Diagnostic value of bronchoalveolar lavage in the subset of patients with negative sputum/smear and mycobacterial culture and a suspicion of pulmonary tuberculosis.Int J Infect Dis. 2019 May;82:96-101. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2019.03.021. Epub 2019 Mar 20. Int J Infect Dis. 2019. PMID: 30904678
-
Diagnostic accuracy of TB-LAMP for pulmonary tuberculosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC Infect Dis. 2019 Mar 19;19(1):268. doi: 10.1186/s12879-019-3881-y. BMC Infect Dis. 2019. PMID: 30890135 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of sputum induction and bronchoscopy in diagnosis of sputum smear-negative pulmonary tuberculosis: a systemic review and meta-analysis.BMC Pulm Med. 2020 May 25;20(1):146. doi: 10.1186/s12890-020-01192-w. BMC Pulm Med. 2020. PMID: 32450826 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
An explanation of the 15-year trend and investigation of the tuberculosis cascade in Kurdistan province.J Clin Tuberc Other Mycobact Dis. 2022 Jun 30;28:100323. doi: 10.1016/j.jctube.2022.100323. eCollection 2022 Aug. J Clin Tuberc Other Mycobact Dis. 2022. PMID: 35813284 Free PMC article.
-
How to diagnose TB in migrants? A systematic review of reviews and decision tree analytical modelling exercise to evaluate properties for single and combined tuberculosis screening tests.Eur Respir J. 2025 Jul 24;66(1):2402000. doi: 10.1183/13993003.02000-2024. Print 2025 Jul. Eur Respir J. 2025. PMID: 40268506 Free PMC article.
-
Mycobacterium tuberculosis Detection Using CRISPR Technology: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Mol Diagn Ther. 2024 Nov;28(6):777-790. doi: 10.1007/s40291-024-00741-x. Epub 2024 Aug 30. Mol Diagn Ther. 2024. PMID: 39212838
-
Potential auxiliary diagnostic role of pentraxin 3 in plasma and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid for pulmonary tuberculosis.J Cardiothorac Surg. 2025 Jul 19;20(1):308. doi: 10.1186/s13019-025-03544-1. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2025. PMID: 40684182 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of multimodal diagnostic approach using deep learning-based automated detection algorithm for active pulmonary tuberculosis.Sci Rep. 2023 Nov 13;13(1):19794. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-47146-0. Sci Rep. 2023. PMID: 37957334 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Raviglione MC, O'Brien RJ. Tuberculosis. In: Kasper F, Hauser F, editors. Harrison’s principles of internal medicine. New York: MacGraw-Hill; 2012. p. 1340-1385.
-
- Glaziou P, Falzon D, Floyd K, Raviglione M. Glaziou P, Falzon D, Floyd K, Raviglione MGlobal epidemiology of tuberculosisSeminars in respiratory and critical car e medicine. Thieme Med. 2013;34:3–16. - PubMed
-
- World Health Organization. Global tuberculosis report 2014. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2014.
-
- Lange C, Chesov D, Furin J, Udwadia Z, Dheda K. Revising the definition of extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis. Lancet Respirator Med. 2018;6(12):893–895. - PubMed