Using participatory research to identify actionable facilitators and barriers to effective inpatient interdisciplinary communication
- PMID: 36448186
- DOI: 10.1002/jhm.13013
Using participatory research to identify actionable facilitators and barriers to effective inpatient interdisciplinary communication
Abstract
Background: Communication failures occur often in the inpatient setting. Efforts to understand and improve communication often exclude patients or are siloed by discipline.
Objective: We aimed to identify barriers and facilitators to effective communication within interdisciplinary inpatient internal medicine (IM) teams using a participatory research approach.
Design: We conducted a single-center participatory mixed methods study using group-level assessment (GLA) and concept mapping to iteratively engage stakeholders. Stakeholder groups included patients/families, IM faculty, IM residents, nurses and ancillary staff, and care managers. Stakeholder-specific GLA sessions were conducted. Participants responded to prompts addressing interdisciplinary communication then worked in small groups to synthesize the qualitative data into unique ideas. A subset of each stakeholder group then sorted ideas through a concept mapping exercise. Multidimensional scaling and hierarchical cluster analysis were used to generate a concept map of the data.
Results: Participants generated 97 unique ideas that were then sorted. The research team chose an eight-cluster concept map representing patient inclusion and engagement, processes and resources, team morale and inclusive dynamics, attitudes and behaviors, effective communication, barriers to communication, the culture of healthcare, and clear expectations. Three larger domains of patient inclusion and engagement, organizational conditions and role clarity, and team dynamics and behaviors were noted.
Conclusion: Use of a participatory research approach made it feasible to engage diverse stakeholders including patients. Our results highlight the need to identify context-specific facilitators and barriers of interdisciplinary communication. The importance of clear expectations was identified as a prioritized area to target communication improvement efforts.
© 2022 Society of Hospital Medicine.
Comment in
-
Ensuring effective interdisciplinary communication.J Hosp Med. 2023 Feb;18(2):198-199. doi: 10.1002/jhm.13043. Epub 2023 Jan 16. J Hosp Med. 2023. PMID: 36645198 No abstract available.
References
REFERENCES
-
- O'Leary KJ, Haviley C, Slade ME, Shah HM, Lee J, Williams MV. Improving teamwork: impact of structured interdisciplinary rounds on a hospitalist unit. J Hosp Med. 2011;6(2):88-93. doi:10.1002/jhm.714
-
- O'Leary KJ, Johnson JK, Auerbach AD. Do interdisciplinary rounds improve patient outcomes? only if they improve teamwork. J Hosp Med. 2016;11(7):524-525. doi:10.1002/jhm.2587
-
- O'Leary KJ, Sehgal NL, Terrell G, Williams MV. Interdisciplinary teamwork in hospitals: a review and practical recommendations for improvement. J Hosp Med. 2012;7(1):48-54. doi:10.1002/jhm.970
-
- Lancaster G, Kolakowsky-Hayner S, Kovacich J, Greer-Williams N. Interdisciplinary communication and collaboration among physicians, nurses, and unlicensed assistive personnel: interdisciplinary communication and collaboration. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2015;47(3):275-284. doi:10.1111/jnu.12130
-
- Kara A, Johnson CS, Hui SL, Kashiwagi D. Hospital-based clinicians' perceptions of geographic cohorting: identifying opportunities for improvement. Am J Med Qual. 2018;33(3):303-312. doi:10.1177/1062860617745123
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources