Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 May;58(3):737-755.
doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12818. Epub 2022 Nov 30.

'Like going into a chocolate shop, blindfolded': What do people with primary progressive aphasia want from speech and language therapy?

Affiliations

'Like going into a chocolate shop, blindfolded': What do people with primary progressive aphasia want from speech and language therapy?

Maria Loizidou et al. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2023 May.

Abstract

Background: Primary progressive aphasia (PPA) describes a group of language-led dementias. PPAs are complex, diverse and difficult to diagnose, and therefore conventional models of aphasia and dementia treatment do not meet their needs. The research evidence on intervention for PPA is developing, but to date there are only a few case studies exploring the experiences of people with PPA (PwPPA) themselves.

Aims: To explore the experiences and opinions of PwPPA and their communication partners (CPs) to understand how speech and language therapy (SLT) services can better meet their needs.

Methods & procedures: A qualitative research approach was used whereby PwPPA and their friends or family members were recruited to participate in focus groups, via advertisements in the Rare Dementia Support PPA group newsletters. Consenting participants were allocated to attend one of four focus groups hosted on an online video conferencing platform. Participants were asked about their communication difficulties, and how SLT could address these needs. All meetings were transcribed, and data were examined using reflexive thematic analysis.

Outcomes & results: Six PwPPA and 14 CPs representing all three PPA variants and mixed PPA participated in the focus groups. Four main themes were identified during the analysis of the focus group discussions: (1) CPs' burden, (2) adjusting to the diagnosis, (3) communication abilities and difficulties and (4) beyond language. A further 10 subthemes were identified.

Conclusions & implications: This study provides a greater understanding of the experiences and needs of PwPPA and their families in relation to SLT. This work underlines the importance of a person-centred approach that considers the broader needs of both the PwPPA and the people around them. This will enable service providers to deliver SLT that meets the needs of PwPPA and their families and will also inform future research in this field.

What this paper adds: What is already known on this subject We know that PwPPA can maintain or even make improvements in word retrieval and speech fluency with SLT exercises. There is also developing evidence of the benefits of interventions such as CP training, communication aid support and other functional interventions. What this paper adds to existing knowledge This study provides an understanding of the experiences and opinions of people living with PPA and their families in relation to SLT. Results demonstrate that PwPPA and their families have to navigate a complex journey, identifying strategies to support communication but also the influence of personality and other cognitive symptoms. SLT was useful, but not always available. What are the potential or actual clinical implications of this work? This study will enable service providers to better plan, justify funding for and delivery of SLT that will meet the needs of PwPPA and their families. Most importantly this work underlines the importance of a person-centred approach, incorporating the broader needs of the person with PPA and those around them.

Keywords: Alzheimer's disease; communication partners, focus groups; primary progressive aphasia; semantic dementia; speech and language therapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors report no financial or non‐financial conflicts of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Schematic representation of the relationships between themes and subthemes. The main four themes are numbered, and yellow, green, blue and red represent the overarching themes and respective subthemes. Coloured lines reflect relationships between certain themes or subthemes as illustrated by participants during discussion. [Colour figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Plummer‐d'Amato, P. (2008). Focus group methodology part 1: Considerations for design. International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation, 15(2), 69–73.
    1. Beeke, S. , Volkmer, A. , & Farrington‐Douglas, C. (2021). TeleCPT: Delivery of a better conversations approach to communication partner training during a global pandemic and beyond. Perspectives of the ASHA Special Interest Groups, 6(6), 1776–1785.
    1. Braun, V. , & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
    1. Braun, V. , & Clarke, V. (2020). Can I use TA? Should I use TA? Should I not use TA? Comparing reflexive thematic analysis and other pattern‐based qualitative analytic approaches. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 21(1), 37–47.
    1. Braun, V. , & Clarke, V. (2021). One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? Qualitative Research in Psychology, 18(3), 328–352.

Publication types