Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jan;32(1):46-54.
doi: 10.1007/s00586-022-07467-6. Epub 2022 Nov 30.

An international validation of the AO spine subaxial injury classification system

Collaborators, Affiliations
Free article

An international validation of the AO spine subaxial injury classification system

Brian A Karamian et al. Eur Spine J. 2023 Jan.
Free article

Abstract

Purpose: To validate the AO Spine Subaxial Injury Classification System with participants of various experience levels, subspecialties, and geographic regions.

Methods: A live webinar was organized in 2020 for validation of the AO Spine Subaxial Injury Classification System. The validation consisted of 41 unique subaxial cervical spine injuries with associated computed tomography scans and key images. Intraobserver reproducibility and interobserver reliability of the AO Spine Subaxial Injury Classification System were calculated for injury morphology, injury subtype, and facet injury. The reliability and reproducibility of the classification system were categorized as slight (ƙ = 0-0.20), fair (ƙ = 0.21-0.40), moderate (ƙ = 0.41-0.60), substantial (ƙ = 0.61-0.80), or excellent (ƙ = > 0.80) as determined by the Landis and Koch classification.

Results: A total of 203 AO Spine members participated in the AO Spine Subaxial Injury Classification System validation. The percent of participants accurately classifying each injury was over 90% for fracture morphology and fracture subtype on both assessments. The interobserver reliability for fracture morphology was excellent (ƙ = 0.87), while fracture subtype (ƙ = 0.80) and facet injury were substantial (ƙ = 0.74). The intraobserver reproducibility for fracture morphology and subtype were excellent (ƙ = 0.85, 0.88, respectively), while reproducibility for facet injuries was substantial (ƙ = 0.76).

Conclusion: The AO Spine Subaxial Injury Classification System demonstrated excellent interobserver reliability and intraobserver reproducibility for fracture morphology, substantial reliability and reproducibility for facet injuries, and excellent reproducibility with substantial reliability for injury subtype.

Keywords: AO spine; AO trauma; Cervical spine; Classification; Validation.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Holdsworth F (1970) Fractures, dislocations, and fracture-dislocations of the spine. J Bone Joint Surg Am 52(8):1534–1551 - DOI
    1. Allen BL Jr, Ferguson RL, Lehmann TR, O’Brien RP (1976) A mechanistic classification of closed, indirect fractures and dislocations of the lower cervical spine. Spine 7(1):1–27. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-198200710-00001 - DOI
    1. Harris JH Jr, Edeiken-Monroe B, Kopaniky DR (1986) A practical classification of acute cervical spine injuries. Orthop Clin North Am 17(1):15–30 - DOI
    1. Vaccaro AR, Hulbert RJ, Patel AA et al (2007) The subaxial cervical spine injury classification system: a novel approach to recognize the importance of morphology, neurology, and integrity of the disco-ligamentous complex. Spine 32(21):2365–74. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181557b92 - DOI
    1. Schroeder GD, Canseco JA, Patel PD et al (2021) Establishing the injury severity of subaxial cervical spine trauma: validating the hierarchical nature of the AO spine subaxial cervical spine injury classification system. Spine 46(10):649–657. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000003873 - DOI

MeSH terms