Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2022 Nov 28:49:e20223363.
doi: 10.1590/0100-6991e-20223363-en. eCollection 2022.

Preoperative risk factors associated with anastomotic leakage after colectomy for colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

[Article in English, Portuguese]
Vinícius Evangelista Dias  1   2   3 , Pedro Alves Soares Vaz DE Castro  4 , Homero Terra Padilha  2 , Lara Vicente Pillar  2 , Laura Botelho Ramos Godinho  2 , Augusto Claudio DE Almeida Tinoco  5 , Rodrigo DA Costa Amil  5 , Aleida Nazareth Soares  1 , Geraldo Magela Gomes DA Cruz  1 , Juliana Maria Trindade Bezerra  4   6   7 , Thais Almeida Marques DA Silva  1
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Preoperative risk factors associated with anastomotic leakage after colectomy for colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

[Article in English, Portuguese]
Vinícius Evangelista Dias et al. Rev Col Bras Cir. .

Abstract
in English, Portuguese

Introduction: anastomotic leak (AL) after colectomy for colorectal cancer (CRC) is a life-threatening complication. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the preoperative risk factors for AL in patients submitted to colectomy.

Methods: the bibliographic search covered 15 years and 9 months, from 1st January 2005 to 19th October 2020 and was performed using PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, Biblioteca Virtual em Saúde, Europe PMC and Web of Science databases. The inclusion criteria were cross-sectional, cohort and case-control studies on preoperative risk factors for AL (outcome). The Newcastle-Ottawa scale was used for bias assessment within studies. Meta-analysis involved the calculation of treatment effects for each individual study including odds ratio (OR), relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) with construction of a random-effects model to evaluate the impact of each variable on the outcome. Statistical significance was set at p<0.05.

Results: cross-sectional studies were represented by 39 articles, cohort studies by 21 articles and case-control by 4 articles. Meta-analysis identified 14 main risk factors for AL in CRC patients after colectomy, namely male sex (RR=1.56; 95% CI=1.40-1.75), smoking (RR=1.48; 95% CI=1.30-1.69), alcohol consumption (RR=1.35; 95% CI=1.21-1.52), diabetes mellitus (RR=1.97; 95% CI=1.44-2.70), lung diseases (RR=2.14; 95% CI=1.21-3.78), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (RR=1.10; 95% IC=1.04-1.16), coronary artery disease (RR=1.61; 95% CI=1.07-2.41), chronic kidney disease (RR=1.34; 95% CI=1.22-1.47), high ASA grades (RR=1.70; 95% CI=1.37-2.09), previous abdominal surgery (RR=1.30; 95% CI=1.04-1.64), CRC-related emergency surgery (RR=1.61; 95% CI=1.26-2.07), neoadjuvant chemotherapy (RR=2.16; 95% CI=1.17-4.02), radiotherapy (RR=2.36; 95% CI=1.33-4.19) and chemoradiotherapy (RR=1.58; 95% CI=1.06-2.35).

Conclusions: important preoperative risk factors for colorectal AL in CRC patients have been identified based on best evidence-based research, and such knowledge should influence decisions regarding treatment.

Objetivo:: fístula anastomótica (FA) após colectomia para câncer colorretal (CCR) é complicação grave. Esta revisão sistemática e meta-análise avaliou os fatores de risco pré-operatórios para FA em pacientes submetidos à colectomia.

Métodos:: a pesquisa bibliográfica abrangeu 15 anos e 9 meses (1 de janeiro de 2005 - 19 de outubro de 2020), sendo utilizadas as plataformas PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, Biblioteca Virtual em Saúde, Europe PMC e Web of Science. O critério de inclusão foram estudos transversais, coorte e caso-controle em fatores de risco pré-operatórios para FA (desfecho). A escala Newcastle-Ottawa foi usada para avaliação de viés dos estudos. A metanálise envolveu o cálculo dos efeitos de tratamento para cada estudo individualmente incluindo odds ratio (OR), risco relativo (RR) e intervalo de confiança de 95% (IC95%) com construção de modelo de efeitos aleatórios, para avaliar o impacto de cada variável (p<0,05).

Resultados:: foram selecionados 39 estudos transversais, 21 coortes e quatro casos-controle. A metanálise identificou 14 fatores de risco para FA em pacientes com CCR após colectomia, que são sexo masculino (RR=1,56; IC 95%=1,40-1,75), tabagismo (RR=1,48; IC 95%=1,30-1,69), alcoolismo (RR=1,35; IC 95%=1,21-1,52), diabetes mellitus (RR=1,97; IC 95%=1,44-2,70), doenças pulmonares (RR=2,14; IC 95%=1,21-3,78), doença pulmonar obstrutiva crônica (RR=1,10; IC 95%=1,04-1,16), doença coronariana (RR=1,61; IC 95%=1,07-2,41), doença renal crônica (RR=1,34; IC 95%=1,22-1,47), altas notas na escala ASA (RR=1,70; IC 95%=1,37-2,09), cirurgia abdominal prévia (RR=1,30; IC 95%=1,04-1,64), cirurgia de emergência (RR=1,61; IC 95%=1,26-2,07), quimioterapia neoadjuvante (RR=2,16; IC 95%=1,17-4,02), radioterapia (RR=2,36; IC 95%=1,33-4,19) e quimiorradioterapia (RR=1,58; IC 95%=1,06-2,35).

Conclusões:: importantes fatores de risco pré-operatórios para FA colorretais em pacientes com CCR foram identificados com base nas melhores pesquisas baseadas em evidências e esse conhecimento deve influenciar decisões relacionadas ao tratamento.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest: no.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Keywords used in the bibliographic search.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Fluxograma dos estudos incluídos.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Forest Plot - Meta-analysis: Risk factor diabetes (cross-sectional studies). 95%CI: 95% Confidence Interval.
Figure 4
Figure 4. Forest Plot - Meta-analysis: Risk factor ASA (cross-sectional studies). 95%CI: 95% Confidence Interval.
Figure 5
Figure 5. Forest Plot - Meta-analysis: Risk factor emergency surgery (cross-sectional studies). 95%CI: 95% Confidence Interval.
Figure 6
Figure 6. Forest Plot - Meta-analysis: Risk factor neoadjuvant chemotherapy (cohort studies). 95%CI: 95% Confidence Interval.
Figure 7
Figure 7. Forest Plot - Meta-analysis: Risk factor neoadjuvant radiotherapy (cohort studies). 95%CI: 95% Confidence Interval.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Kinugasa T, Nagasu S, Murotani K, Mizobe T, Ochi T, Isobe T. Analysis of risk factors for anastomotic leakage after lower rectal Cancer resection, including drain type a retrospective single-center study. BMC Gastroenterol. 2020;20:315–315. doi: 10.1186/s12876-020-01462-1. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zhou S, Zhou H, Zheng Z, Liang J, Zhou Z, Wang X. Predictive risk factors for anastomotic leakage after anterior resection of rectal cancer in elderly patients over 80 years old an analysis of 288 consecutive patients. World J Surg Oncol. 2019;17:112–112. doi: 10.1186/s12957-019-1655-z. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zhou C, Wu X-R, Liu X-H, Chen Y-F, Ke J, He X-W. Male gender is associated with an increased risk of anastomotic leak in rectal cancer patients after total mesorectal excision. Gastroenterol Rep. 2018;6(2):137–143. doi: 10.1093/gastro/gox039. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pommergaard H-C, Gessler B, Burcharth J, Angenete E, Haglind E, Rosenberg J. Preoperative risk factors for anastomotic leakage after resection for colorectal cancer a systematic review and meta-analysis. Colorectal Dis. 2014;16(9):662–671. doi: 10.1111/codi.12618. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Luchini C, Stubbs B, Solmi M, Veronese N. Assessing the quality of studies in meta-analyses Advantages and limitations of the Newcastle Ottawa scale. World J Meta-Anal. 2017;5(4):80–84. doi: 10.13105/wjma.v5.i4.80. - DOI