Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Case Reports
. 2023 Jul 15;62(14):2077-2083.
doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.0409-22. Epub 2022 Nov 30.

Two Cases with Isolated Splenic Sarcoidosis Diagnosed by an Ultrasound-guided Fine-needle Aspiration Biopsy

Affiliations
Case Reports

Two Cases with Isolated Splenic Sarcoidosis Diagnosed by an Ultrasound-guided Fine-needle Aspiration Biopsy

Aya Tanimoto et al. Intern Med. .

Abstract

Asymptomatic splenic nodules were detected incidentally in two middle-aged women at an annual checkup. They showed no abnormalities on laboratory tests, but imaging studies revealed splenic nodules. No other localized lesions were found. Splenic nodules were hypoechoic on ultrasonography (US), hypovascular on contrast-enhanced computed tomography, and showed a low intensity on T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. We performed US-guided percutaneous aspiration biopsies using 21-gauge needles without complications, including bleeding. Pathological specimens showed noncaseating granulomas, so both patients were diagnosed with isolated splenic sarcoidosis. A US-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy is a safe and useful method for diagnosing splenic nodules.

Keywords: fine-needle aspiration biopsy; isolated splenic sarcoidosis; ultrasonography.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors state that they have no Conflict of Interest (COI).

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Case 1; fat suppressed T2 weighted MRI images at a) January 2014, b) March, 2015, c) January, 2016 and d) May, 2016.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Case 1; splenic nodules on admission. a) Ultrasonography showed a hypoechoic nodule, 11.2 mm (A) ×11.4 mm (B). Contrast enhanced CT at b) arterial phase and c) equilibrium phase. Plain MRI on d) T1, e) T2 and f) fat suppression T2 weighted images.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Pathological specimens (Hematoxylin and Eosin staining) obtained by 21-guage needle aspiration biopsies, a) b) case 1 and c) d) case 2. They showed compact epithelioid cell granulomas. Langhans-type multinucleated giant cells were contained in case 1 (arrows), but not in case 2.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Case 2; splenic nodule on admission. a) Ultrasonography, b) plain CT, contrast enhanced CT at c) early phase and d) late phase, and e) gallium scintigraphy. Plain MRI on f) T1, g) T2 and h) fat suppressed T2 weighted images, and gadolinium enhanced MRI at i) early phase, j) late phase and k) equilibrium phase.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. O'Regan A, Berman JS. Sarcoidosis. Ann Intern Med 156: ITC5-1-ITC5-15; quiz ITC5-16, 2012. - PubMed
    1. Valeyre D, Prasse A, Nunes H, et al. . Sarcoidosis. Lancet 383: 1155-1167, 2014. - PubMed
    1. Baughman RP, Lower EE, du Bois RM. Sarcoidosis. Lancet 361: 1111-1118, 2003. - PubMed
    1. Newman LS, Rose CS, Bresnitz EA, et al. . A case control etiologic study of sarcoidosis: environmental and occupational risk factors. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 170: 1324-1330, 2004. - PubMed
    1. Muller-Quernheim J, Schurmann M, Hofmann S, et al. . Genetics of sarcoidosis. Clin Chest Med 29: 391-414, viii, 2008. - PubMed

Publication types