Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jan;26(1):111-123.
doi: 10.1111/ele.14138. Epub 2022 Nov 30.

Species divergence under competition and shared predation

Marius Roesti  1   2 , Jeffrey S Groh  2   3 , Stephanie A Blain  2 , Magnus Huss  2   4 , Peter Rassias  2 , Daniel I Bolnick  5 , Yoel E Stuart  6 , Catherine L Peichel  1 , Dolph Schluter  2
Affiliations

Species divergence under competition and shared predation

Marius Roesti et al. Ecol Lett. 2023 Jan.

Abstract

Species competing for resources also commonly share predators. While competition often drives divergence between species, the effects of shared predation are less understood. Theoretically, competing prey species could either diverge or evolve in the same direction under shared predation depending on the strength and symmetry of their interactions. We took an empirical approach to this question, comparing antipredator and trophic phenotypes between sympatric and allopatric populations of threespine stickleback and prickly sculpin fish that all live in the presence of a trout predator. We found divergence in antipredator traits between the species: in sympatry, antipredator adaptations were relatively increased in stickleback but decreased in sculpin. Shifts in feeding morphology, diet and habitat use were also divergent but driven primarily by stickleback evolution. Our results suggest that asymmetric ecological character displacement indirectly made stickleback more and sculpin less vulnerable to shared predation, driving divergence of antipredator traits between sympatric species.

Keywords: adaptive divergence; asymmetric interactions; biotic selection; character displacement; sculpin; species interactions; stickleback.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Abrams, P.A. (1998) High competition with low similarity and low competition with high similarity: Exploitative and apparent competition in consumer-resource systems. The American Naturalist, 152, 114-128.
    1. Abrams, P.A. (2000) Character shifts of prey species that share predators. The American Naturalist, 156, 45-61.
    1. Abrams, P.A. & Chen, X. (2002a) The effect of competition between prey species on the evolution of their vulnerabilities to a shared predator. Evolutionary Ecology Research, 4, 897-909.
    1. Abrams, P.A. & Chen, X. (2002b) The evolution of traits affecting resource acquisition and predator vulnerability: Character displacement under real and apparent competition. The American Naturalist, 160, 692-704.
    1. Abrams, P.A. & Matsuda, H. (1996) Positive indirect effects between prey species that share predators. Ecology, 77, 610-616.

LinkOut - more resources