Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comment
. 2023 Mar;31(3):279-281.
doi: 10.1038/s41431-022-01241-4. Epub 2022 Dec 1.

Reply to Letter by Tellier et al., 'Scientific refutation of ESHG statement on embryo selection'

Francesca Forzano  1 , Olga Antonova  2 , Angus Clarke  3 , Guido de Wert  4 , Sabine Hentze  5 , Yalda Jamshidi  6 , Yves Moreau  7 , Markus Perola  8 , Inga Prokopenko  9   10   11 , Andrew Read  12 , Alexandre Reymond  13 , Vigdis Stefansdottir  14 , Carla van El  15 , Maurizio Genuardi  16   17 ; Executive Committee of the European Society of Human Genetics; Public and Professional Policy Committee of the European Society of Human Genetics
Collaborators, Affiliations
Comment

Reply to Letter by Tellier et al., 'Scientific refutation of ESHG statement on embryo selection'

Francesca Forzano et al. Eur J Hum Genet. 2023 Mar.

Erratum in

  • Correction to: Reply to Letter by Tellier et al., 'Scientific refutation of ESHG statement on embryo selection'.
    Forzano F, Antonova O, Clarke A, de Wert G, Hentze S, Jamshidi Y, Moreau Y, Perola M, Prokopenko I, Read A, Reymond A, Stefansdottir V, van El C, Genuardi M; Executive Committee of the European Society of Human Genetics; Public and Professional Policy Committee of the European Society of Human Genetics. Forzano F, et al. Eur J Hum Genet. 2023 Mar;31(3):368. doi: 10.1038/s41431-022-01263-y. Eur J Hum Genet. 2023. PMID: 36536147 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Comment on

References

    1. Forzano F, Antonova O, Clarke A, de Wert G, Hentze S, Jamshidi Y, et al. The use of polygenic risk scores in pre-implantation genetic testing: an unproven, unethical practice. Eur J Hum Genet. 2022;30:493–5. doi: 10.1038/s41431-021-01000-x. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. ACMG Board of Directors Direct-to-consumer prenatal testing for multigenic or polygenic disorders: a position statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG). Genet Med. 2021;23:2027–8. - PubMed
    1. ESHRE. ESHRE supports the position of ESHG on embryo selection based on polygenic risk scores. 2022. https://www.eshre.eu/Europe/Position-statements/PRS.
    1. ISPG Board Advisory on the use of Polygenic Risk Scores to screen embryos for adult mental health conditions. 2021. https://ispg.net/ethics-statement/.
    1. Polygenic Risk Score Task Force of the International Common Disease Alliance. Responsible use of polygenic risk scores in the clinic: potential benefits, risks and gaps. Nat Med. 2021;27:1876–84. doi: 10.1038/s41591-021-01549-6. - DOI - PubMed