Cretaceous ornithurine supports a neognathous crown bird ancestor
- PMID: 36450906
- DOI: 10.1038/s41586-022-05445-y
Cretaceous ornithurine supports a neognathous crown bird ancestor
Abstract
The bony palate diagnoses the two deepest clades of extant birds: Neognathae and Palaeognathae1-5. Neognaths exhibit unfused palate bones and generally kinetic skulls, whereas palaeognaths possess comparatively rigid skulls with the pterygoid and palatine fused into a single element, a condition long considered ancestral for crown birds (Neornithes)3,5-8. However, fossil evidence of palatal remains from taxa close to the origin of Neornithes is scarce, hindering strong inferences regarding the ancestral condition of the neornithine palate. Here we report a new taxon of toothed Late Cretaceous ornithurine bearing a pterygoid that is remarkably similar to those of the extant neognath clade Galloanserae (waterfowl + landfowl). Janavis finalidens, gen. et sp. nov., is generally similar to the well-known Mesozoic ornithurine Ichthyornis in its overall morphology, although Janavis is much larger and exhibits a substantially greater degree of postcranial pneumaticity. We recovered Janavis as the first-known well-represented member of Ichthyornithes other than Ichthyornis, clearly substantiating the persistence of the clade into the latest Cretaceous9. Janavis confirms the presence of an anatomically neognathous palate in at least some Mesozoic non-crown ornithurines10-12, suggesting that pterygoids similar to those of extant Galloanserae may be plesiomorphic for crown birds. Our results, combined with recent evidence on the ichthyornithine palatine12, overturn longstanding assumptions about the ancestral crown bird palate, and should prompt reevaluation of the purported galloanseran affinities of several bizarre early Cenozoic groups such as the 'pseudotoothed birds' (Pelagornithidae)13-15.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.
Comment in
-
Fossil find suggests ancestral bird beak was mobile.Nature. 2022 Dec;612(7938):35-36. doi: 10.1038/d41586-022-03692-7. Nature. 2022. PMID: 36450903 No abstract available.
References
-
- Huxley, T. H. On the classification of birds; and on the taxonomic value of the modifications of certain of the cranial bones observed in that class. J. Anat. Physiol. 2, 390 (1868).
-
- Pycraft, W. P. On the morphology and phylogeny of the Palæognathæ (Ratitæand Crypturi) and Neognathæ (Carinatæ). Trans. Zool. Soc. Lond. 15, 149–290 (1900). - DOI
-
- Pycraft, W. P. Some points in the morphology of the palate of the Neognathæ. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 28, 343–357 (1901). - DOI
-
- McDowell, S. The bony palate of birds. Part I. The Palaeognathae. Auk 65, 520–549 (1948). - DOI
-
- Simonetta, A. M. On the mechanical implications of the avian skull and their bearing on the evolution and classification of birds. Q. Rev. Biol. 35, 206–220 (1960). - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources