Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Nov 25:10:e14453.
doi: 10.7717/peerj.14453. eCollection 2022.

Scaredy-cats don't succeed: behavioral traits predict problem-solving success in captive felidae

Affiliations

Scaredy-cats don't succeed: behavioral traits predict problem-solving success in captive felidae

Victoria L O'Connor et al. PeerJ. .

Abstract

Behavioral traits can be determined from the consistency in an animal's behaviors across time and situations. These behavioral traits may have been differentially selected in closely related species. Studying the structure of these traits across species within an order can inform a better understanding of the selection pressures under which behavior evolves. These adaptive traits are still expected to vary within individuals and might predict general cognitive capacities that facilitate survival, such as behavioral flexibility. We derived five facets (Flexible/Friendly, Fearful/Aggressive, Uninterested, Social/Playful, and Cautious) from behavioral trait assessments based on zookeeper surveys in 52 Felidae individuals representing thirteen species. We analyzed whether age, sex, species, and these facets predicted success in a multi access puzzle box-a measure of innovation. We found that Fearful/Aggressive and Cautious facets were negatively associated with success. This research provides the first test of the association between behavioral trait facets and innovation in a diverse group of captive felidae. Understanding the connection between behavioral traits and problem-solving can assist in ensuring the protection of diverse species in their natural habitats and ethical treatment in captivity.

Keywords: Behavioral flexibility; Cats; Individual differences; Innovation; Keeper assessment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Victoria O’Connor declares that she has no competing interests. Jennifer Vonk is a Section Editor for PeerJ.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. The multi-access puzzle box showing the open push door technique, or solution one which is opened by pushing the door allowing for access to the food reward.
Figure 2
Figure 2. The multi-access puzzle box showing the pull rope technique, or solution two which swings open by pulling the rope exposing the inside of the box.
Figure 3
Figure 3. The multi-access puzzle box showing the open pull door technique, or solution three which pulls down flush to the ground, exposing the entire inside of the box.
Figure 4
Figure 4. Structure of the first three facets extracted from the PCA.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Amici F, Widdig A, Lehmann J, Majolo B. A meta-analysis of interindividual differences in innovation. Animal Behaviour. 2019;155:257–268. doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2019.07.008. - DOI
    1. Aplin LM, Farine DR, Mann RP, Sheldon BC. Individual-level personality influences social foraging and collective behavior in wild birds. Proceedings of The Royal Society; 2014. pp. 281–1789. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Benson-Amram S, Dantzer B, Stricker G, Swanson EM, Holekamp KE. Brain size predicts problem-solving ability in mammalian carnivores. Proceedings of theNational Academy of Science, USA. 2016;113(9):2532–2537. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1505913113. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Benson-Amram S, Holekamp KE. Innovative problem solving by wild spotted hyenas. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2012;279(1744):4087–4095. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Benson-Amram S, Weldele ML, Holekamp KE. A comparison of innovative problem-solving abilities between wild and captive spotted hyaenas, Crocuta crocuta. Animal Behaviour. 2013;85(2):349–356. doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2012.11.003. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources