A review of techniques and outcomes of endothelial keratoplasty in congenital hereditary endothelial dystrophy
- PMID: 36453297
- PMCID: PMC9940565
- DOI: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_1313_22
A review of techniques and outcomes of endothelial keratoplasty in congenital hereditary endothelial dystrophy
Abstract
Congenital hereditary endothelial dystrophy affects the Descemet membrane and endothelium, resulting in corneal decompensation. Penetrating keratoplasty (PKP) has been the gold-standard surgical management until recently; however, at present, endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK/DSAEK/n-DSEK: Descemet-stripping or non-Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty and DMEK/n-DMEK: Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty) is being preferred due to lesser intraoperative and postoperative complications, early visual recovery, and comparable visual outcomes. Endothelial keratoplasty (EK) can be challenging, especially in pediatric eyes with CHED due to smaller eyeballs, shallow anterior chambers, phakic status, and poor intraoperative visibility due to thick and hazy corneas. A total of 198 articles matched our search strategy. After screening for duplication and going through the titles and abstracts, 12 relevant original articles, one case series, and six case reports were included in this review. Various surgical modifications have to be adopted in comparison to adult eyes to overcome the aforementioned difficulties. Regardless, studies have shown favorable visual outcomes with better graft survival and fewer complications in eyes that underwent EK compared to PKP. Hence, timely surgical intervention and strict amblyopia management can result in better final visual outcomes. The purpose of this review is to summarize various intraoperative difficulties and the surgical modifications required, different surgical techniques, visual and graft-related outcomes, and various complications of EK in CHED eyes.
Keywords: Congenital hereditary endothelial dystrophy; Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty; Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty; endothelial keratoplasty.
Conflict of interest statement
None
Figures

Comment in
-
Commentary: Endothelial keratoplasty in congenital hereditary endothelial dystrophy - Benefits and challenges.Indian J Ophthalmol. 2022 Dec;70(12):4117-4118. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_2245_22. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2022. PMID: 36453298 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Weiss JS, Møller HU, Aldave AJ, Seitz B, Bredrup C, Kivelä T, et al. IC3D classification of corneal dystrophies--edition 2. Cornea. 2015;34:117–59. - PubMed
-
- Schaumberg DA, Moyes AL, Gomes JAP, Dana MR. Corneal transplantation in young children with congenital hereditary endothelial dystrophy:Multicenter pediatric keratoplasty study. Am J Ophthalmol. 1999;127:373–8. - PubMed
-
- Sajjadi H, Javadi MA, Hemmati R, Mirdeghan A, Parvin M, Nassiri N. Results of penetrating keratoplasty in CHED:Congenital hereditary endothelial dystrophy. Cornea. 1995;14:18–25. - PubMed
-
- Al-Rajhi AA, Wagoner MD. Penetrating keratoplasty in congenital hereditary endothelial dystrophy. Ophthalmology. 1997;104:956–61. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials