Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Dec;30(3-4):275-295.
doi: 10.1007/s10728-022-00453-5. Epub 2022 Dec 1.

Altruistic Vaccination: Insights from Two Focus Group Studies

Affiliations

Altruistic Vaccination: Insights from Two Focus Group Studies

Steven R Kraaijeveld et al. Health Care Anal. 2022 Dec.

Abstract

Vaccination can protect vaccinated individuals and often also prevent them from spreading disease to other people. This opens up the possibility of getting vaccinated for the sake of others. In fact, altruistic vaccination has recently been conceptualized as a kind of vaccination that is undertaken primary for the benefit of others. In order to better understand the potential role of altruistic motives in people's vaccination decisions, we conducted two focus group studies with a total of 37 participants. Study 1 included three focus groups on the subject of HPV vaccination for boys. Study 2 included three focus groups on the subject of pertussis and measles vaccination for childcare workers. We found substantial evidence of other-regarding motives across all focus groups, which suggests that altruistic motives could be an important factor when it comes to people's vaccination decisions. We address the significance of these findings for vaccination policy surrounding HPV vaccination for boys and vaccination for childcare workers. We also extend the findings to normative work on vaccination for the sake of others more generally.

Keywords: altruism; altruistic vaccination; empirical ethics; focus groups; vaccination ethics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Rashid H, Khandaker G, Booy R. Vaccination and herd immunity: what more do we know? Current Opinion in Infectious Diseases. 2012;25(3):243–249. doi: 10.1097/QCO.0b013e328352f727. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mallory ML, Lindesmith LC, Baric RS. Vaccination-Induced Herd immunity: Successes and Challenges. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. 2019;142(1):64–66. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2018.05.007. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kraaijeveld S. R. Vaccinating for whom? Distinguishing between Self-Protective, paternalistic, altruistic and indirect vaccination. Public Health Ethics. 2020;13(2):190–200. doi: 10.1093/phe/phaa005. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global Cancer Statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians. 2018;68:394–424. - PubMed
    1. Hope K, Butler M, Massey PD, Cashman P, Durrheim DN, Stephenson J, Worley A. Pertussis vaccination in Child Care Workers: room for improvement in coverage, policy and practice. BMC Pediatrics. 2012;12(98):1–5. - PMC - PubMed

Grants and funding

LinkOut - more resources