Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2024 Summer;36(2):230-241.
doi: 10.1053/j.semtcvs.2022.08.019. Epub 2022 Nov 29.

Palliated Hypoplastic Left Heart Syndrome Patients Experience Superior Waitlist and Comparable Post-Heart Transplant Survival to Non-Single Ventricle Congenital Heart Disease Patients

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Palliated Hypoplastic Left Heart Syndrome Patients Experience Superior Waitlist and Comparable Post-Heart Transplant Survival to Non-Single Ventricle Congenital Heart Disease Patients

Jason W Greenberg et al. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2024 Summer.

Abstract

Congenital heart disease (CHD) is a well-established risk factor for inferior waitlist and post-heart transplant survival in children. Differences in outcomes between CHD subgroups are understudied. The present study compared outcomes for palliated hypoplastic left heart syndrome (HLHS) patients to other non-single ventricle CHD (non-SVCHD) and non-CHD patients. United Network for Organ Sharing was used to identify children (age < 18) listed for heart transplant in the United States between 2016 and 2021. CHD sub-diagnoses were only available for United Network for Organ Sharing status 1a after 2015, thereby defining the cohort. Waitlist outcomes were studied using competing-risk time-to-event analysis for transplantation, mortality/decompensation, and alive-on-waitlist. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were used to identify factors associated with inferior post-transplant survival. Patients included: palliated-HLHS (n = 477), non-SVCHD (n = 686), and non-CHD (n = 1261). At listing, Palliated-HLHS patients were older than non-SVCHD (median 2-year [IQR 0-8] vs median 0-year [0-3], respectively) and younger than non-CHD (median 7-year [0-14]) (P < 0.001 vs both), and were more likely to be white (P < 0.01 vs both). Upon time-to-event analysis, rates of waitlist mortality/decompensation rates were greater among non-SVCHD than palliated-HLHS. Post-transplant survival was comparable between palliated-HLHS and non-SVCHD (P = 0.920) but worse compared to non-CHD (P < 0.001). Both palliated-HLHS (HR 2.40 [95% CI 1.68-3.42]) and non-SVSCHD (2.04 [1.39-2.99]) were independently associated with post-transplant mortality. Palliated-HLHS patients with heart failure experience significantly worse post-transplant outcomes than non-CHD but, compared to other CHD patients, experience superior waitlist and comparable post-transplant survival. While a high-risk cohort, HLHS patients can achieve gratifying waitlist and post-transplant survival.

Keywords: Clinical outcomes; Congenital cardiac surgery; Congenital heart disease; Heart transplantation; Hypoplastic left heart syndrome; Norwood procedure; Quality improvement.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosures: The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Time-to-event, competing-risk analysis of waitlist outcomes for surgically palliated hypoplastic left heart syndrome (HLHS) patients.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Time-to-event, competing-risk analysis of waitlist outcomes for non-single ventricle congenital heart disease (non-SV CHD) patients.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Time-to-event, competing-risk analysis of waitlist outcomes for non-congenital heart disease (non-CHD) patients.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Kaplan-Meier survival curves (with 95% confidence intervals shown) of post-transplant survival by diagnosis group. *HLHS, previously palliated hypoplastic left heart syndrome patients; non-SV CHD, non-single-ventricle congenital heart disease; non-CHD, non-congenital heart disease.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Graphical abstract, pictorially illustrating the methods, results, and implications of the study.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Krasuski RA, Bashore TM. Congenital Heart Disease Epidemiology in the United States: Blindly Feeling for the Charging Elephant. Circulation. 2016;134(2):110–113. doi: 10.1161/circulationaha.116.023370 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gilboa SM, Devine OJ, Kucik JE, et al. Congenital Heart Defects in the United States: Estimating the Magnitude of the Affected Population in 2010. Circulation. 2016;134(2):101–109. doi: 10.1161/circulationaha.115.019307 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hinton RB, Ware SM. Heart Failure in Pediatric Patients With Congenital Heart Disease. Circ Res. 2017;120(6):978–994. doi: 10.1161/circresaha.116.308996 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Canter CE, Shaddy RE, Bernstein D, et al. Indications for Heart Transplantation in Pediatric Heart Disease. Circulation. 2007;115(5):658–676. doi: 10.1161/circulationaha.106.180449 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cohen W, Combs P, El-Zein C, et al. Outcomes From Three Decades of Infant and Pediatric Heart Transplantation. Asaio J. 2020;Publish Ahead of Print(9):1051–1059. doi: 10.1097/mat.0000000000001312 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms