Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Editorial
. 2023 Jan;37(1):1-4.
doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09772-z. Epub 2022 Dec 1.

Network meta-analysis as a tool in clinical practice guidelines

Collaborators, Affiliations
Editorial

Network meta-analysis as a tool in clinical practice guidelines

Stavros A Antoniou et al. Surg Endosc. 2023 Jan.
No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment on

References

    1. Boni L, Huo B, Alberici L, Ricci C, Tsokani S, Mavridis D, Amer YSAD, Andreou A, Berriman T, Donatelli G, Forbes N, Kapiris S, Kayaalp C, Kylänpää L, Parra-Membrives P, Siersema PD, Black GF, Antoniou SA (2022) EAES Rapid Guideline: Updated systematic review, network meta-analysis, CINeMA and GRADE assessment, and evidence-informed European recommendations on the management of common bile duct stones. Surg Endosc 36(11):7863–7876. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-022-09662-4 - DOI
    1. Salanti G (2012) Indirect and mixed-treatment comparison, network, or multiple-treatments meta-analysis: many names, many benefits, many concerns for the next generation evidence synthesis tool. Res Synth Methods 3(2):80–97. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1037 - DOI
    1. Seitidis G, Nikolakopoulos S, Hennessy EA, Tanner-Smith EE, Mavridis D (2022) Network Meta-Analysis Techniques for Synthesizing Prevention Science Evidence. Prev Sci 23(3):415–424. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-021-01289-6 - DOI
    1. Rücker G, Schwarzer G (2015) Ranking treatments in frequentist network meta-analysis works without resampling methods. BMC Med Res Methodol 15:58. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-015-0060-8 - DOI
    1. Nikolakopoulou A, Mavridis D, Furukawa TA, Cipriani A, Tricco AC, Straus SE, Siontis GCM, Egger M, Salanti G (2018) Living network meta-analysis compared with pairwise meta-analysis in comparative effectiveness research: empirical study. BMJ 28(360):k585. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.k585.PMID:29490922;PMCID:PMC5829520 - DOI

LinkOut - more resources