Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Dec 1;18(1):98.
doi: 10.1186/s12992-022-00886-6.

Structure, functions, performance and gaps of event-based surveillance (EBS) in Sudan, 2021: a cross-sectional review

Elfatih Mohamed Malik  1   2 , Ahmad Izzoddeen Abdullah  3   4 , Sabir Ali Mohammed  5 , Abdelgadir Ali Bashir  2 , Rayyan Ibrahim  2 , Abdalla Mohammed Abdalla  6 , Muntasir Mohamed Osman  6 , Tahani Amin Mahmoud  6 , Mohamed Abdalhafiz Alkhidir  7 , Suleiman Gamal Elgorashi  6 , Mazza Abasher Alzain  6 , Omer Elbadri Mohamed  5 , Ismaiel Mohamed Ismaiel  6 , Hatim Fadelalsyeed Fadelmula  5 , Babiker Ahmed Ali Magboul  6 , Muzhgan Habibi  8 , Mahmoud Sadek  8 , Ahmed Aboushady  8 , Christopher Lane  9
Affiliations
Review

Structure, functions, performance and gaps of event-based surveillance (EBS) in Sudan, 2021: a cross-sectional review

Elfatih Mohamed Malik et al. Global Health. .

Abstract

Background: Event-based surveillance (EBS) is an essential component of Early Warning Alert and Response (EWAR) as per the International Health Regulations (IHR), 2005. EBS was established in Sudan in 2016 as a complementary system for Indicator-based surveillance (IBS). This review will provide an overview of the current EBS structure, functions and performance in Sudan and identify the gaps and ways forward. METHODS: The review followed the WHO/EMRO guidelines and tools. Structured discussions, observation and review of records and guidelines were done at national and state levels. Community volunteers were interviewed through phone calls. Directors of Health Emergency and Epidemic Control, surveillance officers and focal persons for EBS at the state level were also interviewed. SPSS software was used to perform descriptive statistical analysis for quantitative data, while qualitative data was analysed manually using thematic analysis, paying particular attention to the health system level allowing for an exploration of how and why experiences differ across levels. Written and verbal consents were obtained from all participants as appropriate.

Results: Sudan has a functioning EBS; however, there is an underestimation of its contribution and importance at the national and states levels. The link between the national level and states is ad hoc or is driven by the need for reports. While community event-based surveillance (CEBS) is functioning, EBS from health facilities and from non-health sectors is not currently active. The integration of EBS into overall surveillance was not addressed, and the pathway from detection to action is not clear. The use of electronic databases and platforms is generally limited. Factors that would improve performance include training, presence of a trained focal person at state level, and regular follow-up from the national level. Factors such as staff turnover, income in relation to expenses and not having a high academic qualification (Diploma or MSc) were noticed as inhibiting factors.

Conclusion: The review recommended revisiting the surveillance structure at national and state levels to put EBS as an essential component and to update guidelines and standard operation procedures SOPs to foster the integration between EBS components and the overall surveillance system. The need for strengthening the link with states, capacity building and re-addressing the training modalities was highlighted.

Keywords: Case detection; Community-based surveillance; Epidemic control; Epidemic response; Event-based surveillance; Health signals; Surveillance.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

All authors declared they have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Sudan map showing the capital of the six visited states (green circle indicates the state capital)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
The structure of SID at national level
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
The structure of HEEC at state level
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Role of each level and the information flow in EBS
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Respondents reported self-assessment related to detection, reporting, verification, risk assessment, perception, planning, satisfaction related to EBS at states level
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. World Health Organization. Early detection, assessment and response to acute public health events: implementation of early warning and response with a focus on event-based surveillance: interim version. World Health Organization; 2014. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/112667.
    1. Drewe JA, Hoinville LJ, Cook AJ, Floyd T, Stärk KD. Evaluation of animal and public health surveillance systems: a systematic review. Epidemiol Infect. 2012;140(4):575–590. doi: 10.1017/S0950268811002160. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Shahab S. Finding value in the evaluation of public health syndromic surveillance systems from a policy perspective. Finding value in the evaluation of public health syndromic surveillance systems from a policy perspective. Alberta: Alberta Health Services; 2009. pp. 1–24.
    1. Abat C, Chaudet H, Rolain JM, Colson P, Raoult D. Traditional and syndromic surveillance of infectious diseases and pathogens. Int J Infect Dis. 2016;1(48):22–28. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2016.04.021. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Al-Said SS. The Health Information System in Sudan: the Disease and outbreaks Surveillance System at the National Level and the State Capital: A Descriptive Study (Master's thesis). https://www.duo.uio.no/bitstream/handle/10852/30029/SaidxAlsaid.pdf?sequ....

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources