Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Dec 1;22(4):465-473.

Effects of NMES-elicited versus voluntary low-level conditioning contractions on explosive knee extensions

Federica Gonnelli  1   2 , Enrico Rejc  3   4 , Mirco Floreani  1   2 , Stefano Lazzer  1   2
Affiliations

Effects of NMES-elicited versus voluntary low-level conditioning contractions on explosive knee extensions

Federica Gonnelli et al. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact. .

Abstract

Objectives: Electrically-induced or voluntary conditioning-contractions (CC) can be used to affect contractile properties of a subsequent explosive contraction (EC). Here, we aimed at comparing the effect of neuromuscular-electrical-stimulation (NMES) vs voluntary CC performed prior to explosive contractions of the knee extensors.

Methods: A 10 sec NMES CC (100Hz, 1000μs, 10% MVC), or a voluntary contraction (VOL CC) mimicking the NMES CC, preceded an isometric EC of the knee extensors. Explosive contraction was performed with the goal to reach the target (70% MVC) as quickly as possible.

Results: All the parameters related with the explosive contractions' muscle-output were similar between protocols (difference ranging from 0.23%, Mean Torque; to 5.8%, Time to Target), except for the Time to Peak Torque, which was lower when preceded by NMES (11.1%, p=0.019). Interestingly, the RTD 0-50 ms_EC was 37.3% higher after the NMES compared with the VOL CC protocol.

Conclusion: Explosive contraction was potentiated by an NMES CC as compared with a voluntary CC. This may be due to a reduction in descending drive following VOL CC, which has been shown to occur even with low-level voluntary efforts. These findings could be used to improve rehabilitation or training protocols that include conditioning contractions.

Keywords: Afferent pathways; Electrical Stimulation; Explosive contraction; Rate of Torque development.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Schematic representation of the experimental protocol (A-B). Maximal Voluntary Contraction (MVC), Neuromuscular Electrical stimulation (NMES) recruitment curve and the NMES Conditioning Contractions protocol were performed on Day 1 (A). MVC and the Voluntary Conditioning Contractions protocol were performed on Day 2 (B).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Muscle mechanical output for one representative subject. Maximal Voluntary Contraction (MVC) (A) was first performed to identify the 10% MVC to be elicited during the Neuromuscular Electrical stimulation (NMES) recruitment phase (B) and during the NMES-Conditioning Contractions protocol. Explosive Voluntary contractions of knee extensors were performed at 70% MVC during the NMES-elicited Conditioning Contractions protocol and the Voluntary one (D). Muscle contractile properties of knee extensors were evaluated during explosive contractions in the first phase after contraction on-set (E).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Bishop D. Warm up I. Sports medicine. 2003;33(6):439–454. - PubMed
    1. Baudry S, Duchateau J. Postactivation potentiation in human muscle is not related to the type of maximal conditioning contraction. Muscle Nerve. 2004;30(3):328–36. - PubMed
    1. Krarup C. Enhancement and diminution of mechanical tension evoked by staircase and by tetanus in rat muscle. J Physiol. 1981;311:355–72. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Vandervoort A, Quinlan J, McComas A. Twitch potentiation after voluntary contraction. Experimental Neurology. 1983;81(1):141–152. - PubMed
    1. Smith CB, Allen MD, Rice CL. Voluntary rate of torque development is impaired after a voluntary versus tetanic conditioning contraction. Muscle Nerve. 2014;49(2):218–24. - PubMed

Substances