Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Dec 9;7(78):eadd3075.
doi: 10.1126/sciimmunol.add3075. Epub 2022 Dec 2.

Route of self-amplifying mRNA vaccination modulates the establishment of pulmonary resident memory CD8 and CD4 T cells

Affiliations

Route of self-amplifying mRNA vaccination modulates the establishment of pulmonary resident memory CD8 and CD4 T cells

Marco Künzli et al. Sci Immunol. .

Abstract

Respiratory tract resident memory T cells (TRM), typically generated by local vaccination or infection, can accelerate control of pulmonary infections that evade neutralizing antibody. It is unknown whether mRNA vaccination establishes respiratory TRM. We generated a self-amplifying mRNA vaccine encoding the influenza A virus nucleoprotein that is encapsulated in modified dendron-based nanoparticles. Here, we report how routes of immunization in mice, including contralateral versus ipsilateral intramuscular boosts, or intravenous and intranasal routes, influenced influenza-specific cell-mediated and humoral immunity. Parabiotic surgeries revealed that intramuscular immunization was sufficient to establish CD8 TRM in the lung and draining lymph nodes. Contralateral, compared with ipsilateral, intramuscular boosting broadened the distribution of lymph node TRM and T follicular helper cells but slightly diminished resulting levels of serum antibody. Intranasal mRNA delivery established modest circulating CD8 and CD4 T cell memory but augmented distribution to the respiratory mucosa. Combining intramuscular immunizations with an intranasal mRNA boost achieved high levels of both circulating T cell memory and lung TRM. Thus, routes of mRNA vaccination influence humoral and cell-mediated immunity, and intramuscular prime-boosting establishes lung TRM that can be further expanded by an additional intranasal immunization.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig 1.
Fig 1.. Impact of ipsilateral versus contralateral intramuscular mRNA-vaccination on CD8 T cell, CD4 T cell, and humoral immunity.
(A) Mice were primed in the right hamstring then boosted in either the right (ipsilateral) or left (contralateral) hamstring. ≥28 days post boost, spleen, iliac LN, medLN and lungs were examined. (B) Quantification of antigen-specific CD8+ T cells in the indicated SLOs. (C-D) Representative flow cytometry plot (C) and quantification (D) of NP366-specific CD8+ CD69+CD62L SLO TRM. (E) Enumeration of antigen-specific CD8+ T cells in the indicated lung compartments. (F-G) Representative flow cytometry plot (F) and quantification (G) of NP366+ CD8 T cell subsets in the lung parenchyma (IV-neg). (H) Enumeration of antigen-specific CD4+ T cells in the indicated SLOs. (I-J) Representative flow cytometry plot (I) and quantification (J) of NP261-specific CD4+ TH1 and TFH in SLOs. (K) Quantification of antigen-specific CD4+T cells in the indicated lung compartments. (L-M) Representative flow cytometry plot (L) and quantification (M) of NP261-specific CD4+ T cell subsets in the lung parenchyma (IV-neg). (N) NP IgG specific serum antibody titers. Open and closed circles represent data from two independent experiments. (O) Ipsilaterally prime-boosted mice were challenged with Influenza A/PR8 IN. Weight relative to initial bodyweight over time (left, middle), and survival (right). Data represent N = 2 independent experiments with n = 4-5 mice per group except for (N-O) where data was pooled from N = 2 independent experiments with n = 8-10 mice. Data are shown as mean ± SEM. *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001, ****P<0.0001 as determined by one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s multiple comparisons test (for 3 groups) or unpaired two-tailed Student’s t test (2 groups) or with log-rank Mantel-Cox test for survival. N.D. = not determined.
Fig 2.
Fig 2.. Comparing routes of immunization reveals that intranasal prime-boost vaccination induces more CD103+ CD8 T cells in the lung parenchyma.
(A) Mice were either IM, IV or IN prime-boosted and spleen, iliac LN, medLN and lungs were examined ≥28 days post boost. (B) Quantification of antigen-specific CD8+ T cells in the indicated SLOs. (C-D) Representative flow cytometry plot (C) and quantification (D) of NP366-specific CD8+ CD69+CD62L SLO TRM. (E) Quantification of antigen-specific CD8+ T cells in the indicated lung compartments. (F-G) Representative flow cytometry plot (F) and quantification (G) of NP366+ CD8 T cell subsets in the lung parenchyma (IV-neg). Data represent N = 2 independent experiments with n = 4-5 mice per group. Data are shown as mean ± SEM. *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001, ****P<0.0001 as determined by one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s multiple comparisons test.
Fig 3.
Fig 3.. mRNA vaccination generates long-lived TFH in the draining LN but not in the lung.
(A) Mice were either IM or IN prime-boosted and spleen, iliac LN, medLN and lungs were examined ≥28 days post boost. (B) Quantification of antigen-specific CD4+ T cells in the indicated SLOs. (C-D) Representative flow cytometry plot (C) and quantification (D) of NP261-specific CD4+ TH1 and TFH in SLOs. (E) NP IgG specific serum antibody titers. Open and closed circles represent data from two independent experiments. (F) Quantification of antigen-specific CD4+ T cells in the indicated lung compartments. (G-H) Representative flow cytometry plot (G) and quantification (H) of NP261-specific CD4+ T cell subsets in the lung parenchyma (IV-neg). (I-J) Quantification (I) and representative flow cytometry plot (J) of NP261-specific CD4+ T cell subsets in the lung parenchyma (IV-neg). Data represent N = 2 independent experiments with n = 4-5 mice per group. Data are shown as mean ± SEM. *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001, ****P<0.0001 as determined by one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s multiple comparisons test (for 3 groups) or unpaired two-tailed Student’s t test (2 groups). N.D. = not determined.
Fig 4.
Fig 4.. All mRNA immunization routes were sufficient to induce pulmonary resident memory CD8 T cells.
(A) Representative image of in situ NP366-tetramer staining in the lung upon IM prime-boost. (B) CD45.2+ mice were either IM or IN prime-boosted and then conjoined to CD45.1+ naïve hosts. After 21 days, lungs were harvested to examine recirculating and resident populations antigen-specific CD8 and CD4 T cells. (C) Representative flow cytometry plots depicting CD45.1+ and CD45.2+ CD8 T cells to demonstrate equilibration in the blood. (D-E) Representative flow cytometry plot (D) and quantification (E) of NP366-specific CD8 T cell subsets in the lung parenchyma. (F-G) Representative flow cytometry plot (F) and quantification (G) of NP261-specific CD4 T cell subsets in the lung parenchyma. Data represent N = 2 independent experiments with n = 4-5 mice per group, except for (A) which represents N = 1 independent experiment with n = 3 mice. Data are shown as mean ± SEM. *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001, ****P<0.0001as determined by unpaired two-tailed Student’s t test.
Fig 5.
Fig 5.. Combining intramuscular immunizations with an intranasal mRNA boost achieves high levels of both circulating memory and lung TRM.
(A) IM prime-boosted mice received a second booster via IN route and spleen, iliac LN, medLN and lungs were examined ≥28 days post secondary boost. (B-C) Quantification of antigen-specific CD8+ T cells (B) and CD4+ T cells (C) in the indicated compartments. (D-E) Representative flow cytometry plot (D) and quantification (E) of IV-neg NP366-specific CD8+ T cell subsets in the lung. (F-G) Representative flow cytometry plot (F) and quantification (G) of IV-neg NP261-specific CD4+ T cell subsets in the lung. Data represent N = 2 independent experiments with n = 4-5 mice per group. Data are shown as mean ± SEM. *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001, ****P<0.0001 as determined by unpaired two-tailed Student’s t test.

References

    1. Ssentongo P et al., SARS-CoV-2 vaccine effectiveness against infection, symptomatic and severe COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Infect Dis 22, 439 (2022). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Feikin DR et al., Duration of effectiveness of vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 disease: results of a systematic review and meta-regression. Lancet 399, 924–944 (2022). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Baden LR et al., Efficacy and Safety of the mRNA-1273 SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine. N Engl J Med 384, 403–416 (2021). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dagan N et al., BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine in a Nationwide Mass Vaccination Setting. N Engl J Med 384, 1412–1423 (2021). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pardi N, Hogan MJ, Porter FW, Weissman D, mRNA vaccines - a new era in vaccinology. Nat Rev Drug Discov 17, 261–279 (2018). - PMC - PubMed

Publication types