Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Dec 1;109(12):2095-2100.
doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2022.10.012.

Addressing the challenges of polygenic scores in human genetic research

Affiliations
Review

Addressing the challenges of polygenic scores in human genetic research

John Novembre et al. Am J Hum Genet. .

Abstract

The genotyping of millions of human samples has made it possible to evaluate variants across the human genome for their possible association with risks for numerous diseases and other traits by using genome-wide association studies (GWASs). The associations between phenotype and genotype found in GWASs make possible the construction of polygenic scores (PGSs), which aim to predict a trait or disease outcome in an individual on the basis of their genotype (in the disease case, the term polygenic risk score [PRS] is often used). PGSs have shown promise for studying the biology of complex traits and as a tool for evaluating individual disease risks in clinical settings. Although the quantity and quality of data to compute PGSs are increasing, challenges remain in the technical aspects of developing PGSs and in the ethical and social issues that might arise from their use. This ASHG Guidance emphasizes three major themes for researchers working with or interested in the application of PGSs in their own research: (1) developing diverse research cohorts; (2) fostering robustness in the development, application, and interpretation of PGSs; and (3) improving the communication of PGS results and their implications to broad audiences.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Ma Y., Zhou X. Genetic prediction of complex traits with polygenic scores: a statistical review. Trends Genet. 2021;37:995–1011. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wray N.R., Kemper K.E., Hayes B.J., Goddard M.E., Visscher P.M. Complex Trait Prediction from Genome Data: Contrasting EBV in Livestock to PRS in Humans: Genomic Prediction. Genetics. 2019;211:1131–1141. - PMC - PubMed
    1. McCarthy M., Birney E. Personalized profiles for disease risk must capture all facets of health. Nature. 2021;597:175–177. - PubMed
    1. Polygenic Risk Score Task Force of the International Common Disease Alliance Responsible use of polygenic risk scores in the clinic: potential benefits, risks and gaps. Nat. Med. 2021;27:1876–1884. - PubMed
    1. Martin A.R., Kanai M., Kamatani Y., Okada Y., Neale B.M., Daly M.J. Clinical use of current polygenic risk scores may exacerbate health disparities. Nat. Genet. 2019;51:584–591. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources