Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Dec 2;16(1):37.
doi: 10.1186/s13037-022-00348-3.

Percutaneous bone adhesive application for Jones fracture "at-risk" of nonunion or delayed union: a hypothesis

Niaz Ahankoob  1 , Vincent P Stahel  2
Affiliations

Percutaneous bone adhesive application for Jones fracture "at-risk" of nonunion or delayed union: a hypothesis

Niaz Ahankoob et al. Patient Saf Surg. .

Abstract

Background: Bone adhesives have been on the forefront of orthopedic surgery research for decades due to the potential benefit they may have in fracture management. Current publications and research being conducted on bone adhesive could be applied to our current hypothesis for the benefit of a novel minimally invasive treatment option for a select cohort of fractures, Jones fractures. The select fracture's gold standard of treatment would be nonoperative, but with risk of complications including nonunion and delayed union.

Presentation of hypothesis: We hypothesize that percutaneous application of bone adhesive will provide an additional treatment option for fracture patterns that do not require operative fixation, but would benefit from additional stability. The primary outcome measures would be (1) duration of time required for bony consolidation (defined as 3 of 4 bridging cortices) and (2) duration of absenteeism (inability to work), and pain levels within the first week after the procedure. Secondary outcome measures would be the incidence of nonunion or delayed union. We hypothesize that the select bone adhesive would accelerate bony consolidation, decrease absenteeism, decrease pain levels within the first week after procedure, and decrease the incidence of delayed union and/or nonunion.

Testing of hypothesis: We propose a prospective multicenter, randomized, and open label trial clinical trial to test the bone adhesive via percutaneous injection into acute non-displaced or minimally displaced Jones fractures.

Implications of hypothesis: Bone adhesives are a new frontier in treatment of fractures, currently in laboratory and animal testing phases. The appropriate bone adhesive formula has not been approved for clinical trial use, but the implications of the bone adhesive may go beyond decreased complications and ease of stabilizing a select cohort of closed fractures. With the injectable compound illustrated (Fig. 1), the adhesive could be applied percutaneously in hopes of achieving improved outcomes compared to non-operative treatment. The overall goal of the clinical trial is to provide patients a safe treatment option for improved bone union rates of nonoperative fractures compared to the current gold standard management of the same fracture with earlier pain control, early bony consolidation and lower risk of delayed union/nonunion. The ideal patient population for use of a percutaneous bone adhesive in future studies would be for those with multiple medical comorbidities for whom surgical risks outweigh the benefits, in addition to patients at high risk for nonunion based on fracture pattern or systemic biology.

Keywords: Bone adhesive; Closed fracture; Fracture displacement; Nonunion; Patient safety.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Simplified illustration of a potential indication for percutaneous bone adhesive injection into the fracture site of a non-displaced Jones fracture as to reduce the risk of a delayed union or nonunion
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Boker KO, Richter K, Jackle K, Taheri S, Grunwald I, Borcherding K, et al. Current state of bone adhesives-necessities and hurdles. Materials. 2019;12(23):3975. 10.3390/ma12233975. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Farrar DF. Bone adhesives for trauma surgery: a review of challenges and developments. Int J Adhes Adhes. 2012;33:89–97. doi: 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2011.11.009. - DOI
    1. Tzagiollari A, McCarthy HO, Levingstone TJ, Dunne NJ. Biodegradable and biocompatible adhesives for the effective stabilisation, repair and regeneration of bone. Bioengineering (Basel). 2022;9(6):250. 10.3390/bioengineering9060250. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Smidt KP, Massey P. 5th Metatarsal Fracture. StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL) 2022.
    1. Mologne TS, Lundeen JM, Clapper MF, O’Brien TJ. Early screw fixation versus casting in the treatment of acute Jones fractures. Am J Sports Med. 2005;33(7):970–5. doi: 10.1177/0363546504272262. - DOI - PubMed