This site needs JavaScript to work properly. Please enable it to take advantage of the complete set of features!

Skip to main page content

Add to Collections

Your saved search

Name of saved search:

Search terms:

Test search terms

Would you like email updates of new search results?

Yes
No

Email: (change)

Frequency:

Which day?

Which day?

Report format:

Send at most:

Send even when there aren't any new results

Optional text in email:

Your RSS Feed

Comment

. 2023 Mar;119(3):514-515.

doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2022.11.019. Epub 2022 Dec 1.

Two studies in the same center, on the same patient population and topic, but with different results: Is the experimental design to blame?

Carlos Simon¹, Maria Ruiz-Alonso², Carlos Gómez², Diana Valbuena²

Affiliations

Affiliations

¹ Carlos Simon Foundation, Fundación para la investigación del Hospital Clínico de la Comunitat Valenciana Health Research Institute, Valencia, Spain; Department of Pediatrics Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
² Igenomix Research and Development, Valencia, Spain.

PMID: 36462548
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2022.11.019

Free article

Comment

Two studies in the same center, on the same patient population and topic, but with different results: Is the experimental design to blame?

Carlos Simon et al. Fertil Steril. 2023 Mar.

Free article

. 2023 Mar;119(3):514-515.

doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2022.11.019. Epub 2022 Dec 1.

Authors

Carlos Simon¹, Maria Ruiz-Alonso², Carlos Gómez², Diana Valbuena²

Affiliations

¹ Carlos Simon Foundation, Fundación para la investigación del Hospital Clínico de la Comunitat Valenciana Health Research Institute, Valencia, Spain; Department of Pediatrics Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
² Igenomix Research and Development, Valencia, Spain.

PMID: 36462548
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2022.11.019

No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Reply of the Authors: Not in the same patient population but on the same topic. The endometrial receptivity array test has not proven clinically useful to improve implantation yet, and our data support this fact.
Cozzolino M, Diaz-Gimeno P, Pellicer A, Garrido N. Cozzolino M, et al. Fertil Steril. 2023 Mar;119(3):516-517. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2022.12.029. Epub 2022 Dec 22. Fertil Steril. 2023. PMID: 36565975 No abstract available.

Comment on

Use of the endometrial receptivity array to guide personalized embryo transfer after a failed transfer attempt was associated with a lower cumulative and per transfer live birth rate during donor and autologous cycles.
Cozzolino M, Diáz-Gimeno P, Pellicer A, Garrido N. Cozzolino M, et al. Fertil Steril. 2022 Oct;118(4):724-736. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2022.07.007. Epub 2022 Sep 6. Fertil Steril. 2022. PMID: 36070983

Publication types

Actions
Actions

MeSH terms

Actions
Actions

LinkOut - more resources

Full Text Sources
- ClinicalKey
- Elsevier Science
Research Materials
- NCI CPTC Antibody Characterization Program