Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Jun;69(4):814-822.
doi: 10.1177/00207640221140290. Epub 2022 Dec 4.

Ideal models of good inpatient care for adults with intellectual disability: Lessons from England

Lisa Burrows  1 , Georgia Page  2 , Elena Plugaru  2 , Bridie Kent  2 , Mahesh Odiyoor  3   4   5 , Sujeet Jaydeokar  3   4   5 , Jonathan Williams  3 , Kevin Elliot  6 , Richard Laugharne  7   8 , Rohit Shankar  7   8
Affiliations
Review

Ideal models of good inpatient care for adults with intellectual disability: Lessons from England

Lisa Burrows et al. Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2023 Jun.

Abstract

Background: In recent years, a significant proportion of inpatient facilities for people with intellectual disabilities and/or autism has been de-commissioned in England, This has resulted in individuals with intellectual disabilities being sent to distant hospitals far away from their families and carers leading to challenges in follow-up, community care and interventions. The impact of de-institutionalisation, has often caused patient trauma, family distress and subsequent discharge difficulties. Not every individual with intellectual disabilities and/or autism requires inpatient care but inpatient care when needed has to be local, adequate and appropriate.

Aims: To evaluate current evidence of utility of inpatient models for people with intellectual disabilities and outline best clinical practice.

Method: PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Scopus, Web of Science were searched with key search terms. The search was conducted by the information specialist and identified abstracts screened further for inclusion criteria, methodological issues, and other appropriate characteristics. Twenty-three papers were included in the rapid review. Papers shortlisted had the inclusion criteria applied against the full text version independently by two reviewers. Disagreements regarding eligibility of studies was resolved by discussion and consensus within the project team. Key data related to in-patient models of care was extracted from the included papers, which included year of study, design, study objectives, target population, method/s tested, outcomes reported, country of study/studies, and results. Data extraction was performed by two reviewers and reviewed by the project team.

Results: From the review of services for people with intellectual disabilities, we came across four broad models/frameworks/approaches. Evidence on what worked for inpatient service provision tended to be based on models developed and implemented locally.

Conclusions: We make recommendations for the best clinical practice and standards. Both clinical service providers and policymakers need to be aware of specific needs of individuals with intellectual disability and/or autism.

Keywords: Intellectual disability; autism; community care; discharge; inpatient care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: RS has received institutional and research support from LivaNova, GW/Jazz pharma, UCB, Eisai, Veriton pharma, Averelle and Destin outside the submitted work. No other author has declared any conflict of interest.

References

    1. Abraham J., Purandare K., McCabe J., Wijeratne A., Eggleston E., Oak K., Laugharne R., Roy A., Shankar R. (2022). An 8-year study of admissions and discharges to a specialist intellectual disability inpatient unit. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 35(2), 569–576. 10.1111/jar.12967 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bartle J., Crossland T., Hewitt O. (2016). ‘Planning Live’: using a person-centred intervention to reduce admissions to and length of stay in learning disability inpatient facilities. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 44, 277–283. 10.1111/bld.12161 - DOI
    1. Chinn D., Hall I., Ali A., Hassell H., Patkas I. (2011). Psychiatric in-Patients away from home: Accounts by people with intellectual disabilities in specialist hospitals outside their home localities. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 24, 50–60. 10.1111/j.1468-3148.2010.00572.x - DOI
    1. Claire Lloyd L., Hemming C., Tracy D. K. (2013). Service users’ experiences, understanding and hopes about care in an inpatient intellectual disability unit: A qualitative study. Advances in Mental Health and Intellectual Disabilities, 7(4), 201–210. 10.1108/amhid-03-2013-0024 - DOI
    1. Cooper S. A., Smiley E., Morrison J., Williamson A., Allan L. (2007). Mental ill-health in adults with intellectual disabilities: prevalence and associated factors. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 190, 27–35. 10.1192/bjp.bp.106.022483 - DOI - PubMed