Effects of dietary energy density and feeding strategy during the dry period on feed intake, energy balance, milk production, and blood metabolites of Holstein cows
- PMID: 36465507
- PMCID: PMC9709607
- DOI: 10.3168/jdsc.2022-0233
Effects of dietary energy density and feeding strategy during the dry period on feed intake, energy balance, milk production, and blood metabolites of Holstein cows
Abstract
Our study aimed to assess the effects of dietary energy density and strategy of delivery during the dry period on production and metabolic responses of Holstein cows free of displacement of abomasum, retained placenta, metritis, or hypocalcemia. Twenty-seven multiparous cows dried-off 50 d before calving were assigned randomly to 1 of 3 dietary treatments: a controlled energy, high-fiber diet [CE; 1.39 Mcal net energy for lactation (NEL)/kg of dry matter (DM)] formulated to supply 100% of the NEL requirement at ad libitum intake; or a higher energy diet (1.58 Mcal/kg) fed either at ad libitum (HE) or restricted (RE) intake to supply ∼150 or 80% of the NEL requirements, respectively. After calving, all cows were fed the same lactation diet. Cows were individually fed and remained in the study until 28 d postpartum. Data were analyzed using 2 contrasts: CE versus HE (effect of diet composition in cows fed for ad libitum DM intake) and HE versus RE (effect of ad libitum or restricted intake of the same diet). Prepartum intakes of DM and NEL as well as energy balance (EB), were greater for HE than CE and greater for HE than RE. Body weight (BW) gain was higher in HE than in RE, but CE and HE did not differ. Change in body condition score did not differ between CE and HE or HE and RE. Postpartum intakes of DM and NEL, EB, BW, body condition score, calf birth BW, milk yield, and milk components did not differ between CE and HE or HE and RE. Concentrations of glucose, insulin, nonesterified fatty acids, β-hydroxybutyrate, Ca, and Mg pre- and postpartum did not differ among diets. Although sample size was low, dry period plane of energy intake affected prepartum DM intake, EB, and BW gain but did not affect postpartum intakes of DM and NEL, yields of milk and milk components, or blood metabolites in healthy cows.
© 2022.
Figures

Similar articles
-
Comparison of prepartum low-energy or high-energy diets with a 2-diet far-off and close-up strategy for multiparous and primiparous cows.J Dairy Sci. 2020 Oct;103(10):9067-9080. doi: 10.3168/jds.2020-18603. Epub 2020 Aug 20. J Dairy Sci. 2020. PMID: 32828502
-
Limit-feeding a high-energy diet to meet energy requirements in the dry period alters plasma metabolite concentrations but does not affect intake or milk production in early lactation.J Dairy Sci. 2008 Mar;91(3):1067-79. doi: 10.3168/jds.2007-0434. J Dairy Sci. 2008. PMID: 18292262
-
Effects of close-up dietary energy level and supplementing rumen-protected lysine on energy metabolites and milk production in transition cows.J Dairy Sci. 2019 Aug;102(8):7059-7072. doi: 10.3168/jds.2018-15962. Epub 2019 Jun 6. J Dairy Sci. 2019. PMID: 31178198
-
Effects of prepartum diets varying in dietary energy density and monensin on early-lactation performance in dairy cows.J Dairy Sci. 2021 Mar;104(3):2881-2895. doi: 10.3168/jds.2020-19414. Epub 2020 Dec 25. J Dairy Sci. 2021. PMID: 33358806
-
Prepartum intake, postpartum induction of ketosis, and periparturient disorders affect the metabolic status of dairy cows.J Dairy Sci. 2005 Sep;88(9):3249-64. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(05)73008-3. J Dairy Sci. 2005. PMID: 16107415
References
-
- Dann H.M., Litherland N.B., Underwood J.P., Bionaz M., D'Angelo A., McFadden J.W., Drackley J.K. Diets during far-off and close-up dry periods affect periparturient metabolism and lactation in multiparous cows. J. Dairy Sci. 2006;89:3563–3577. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(06)72396-7. 16899692. - DOI - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources