Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Aug 6;3(6):403-407.
doi: 10.3168/jdsc.2022-0233. eCollection 2022 Nov.

Effects of dietary energy density and feeding strategy during the dry period on feed intake, energy balance, milk production, and blood metabolites of Holstein cows

Affiliations

Effects of dietary energy density and feeding strategy during the dry period on feed intake, energy balance, milk production, and blood metabolites of Holstein cows

A Pineda et al. JDS Commun. .

Abstract

Our study aimed to assess the effects of dietary energy density and strategy of delivery during the dry period on production and metabolic responses of Holstein cows free of displacement of abomasum, retained placenta, metritis, or hypocalcemia. Twenty-seven multiparous cows dried-off 50 d before calving were assigned randomly to 1 of 3 dietary treatments: a controlled energy, high-fiber diet [CE; 1.39 Mcal net energy for lactation (NEL)/kg of dry matter (DM)] formulated to supply 100% of the NEL requirement at ad libitum intake; or a higher energy diet (1.58 Mcal/kg) fed either at ad libitum (HE) or restricted (RE) intake to supply ∼150 or 80% of the NEL requirements, respectively. After calving, all cows were fed the same lactation diet. Cows were individually fed and remained in the study until 28 d postpartum. Data were analyzed using 2 contrasts: CE versus HE (effect of diet composition in cows fed for ad libitum DM intake) and HE versus RE (effect of ad libitum or restricted intake of the same diet). Prepartum intakes of DM and NEL as well as energy balance (EB), were greater for HE than CE and greater for HE than RE. Body weight (BW) gain was higher in HE than in RE, but CE and HE did not differ. Change in body condition score did not differ between CE and HE or HE and RE. Postpartum intakes of DM and NEL, EB, BW, body condition score, calf birth BW, milk yield, and milk components did not differ between CE and HE or HE and RE. Concentrations of glucose, insulin, nonesterified fatty acids, β-hydroxybutyrate, Ca, and Mg pre- and postpartum did not differ among diets. Although sample size was low, dry period plane of energy intake affected prepartum DM intake, EB, and BW gain but did not affect postpartum intakes of DM and NEL, yields of milk and milk components, or blood metabolites in healthy cows.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

None
Summary: Dietary plane of energy intake during the dry period significantly affected dry matter intake, energy balance, and body weight gain, but did not affect body condition score or its change in cows that were free of displacement of abomasum, retained placenta, metritis, and hypocalcemia. Prepartum energy intake did not affect postpartum intakes of dry matter and energy, milk yield, milk composition, or blood metabolites measured 5 d before through 5 d after calving.

Similar articles

References

    1. Agenäs S., Burstedt E., Holtenius K. Effects of feeding intensity during the dry period. 1. Feed intake, body weight, and milk production. J. Dairy Sci. 2003;86:870–882. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(03)73670-4. 12703624. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cardoso F.C., LeBlanc S.J., Murphy M.R., Drackley J.K. Prepartum nutritional strategy affects reproductive performance in dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 2013;96:5859–5871. doi: 10.3168/jds.2013-6759. 23810594. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Colazo M.G., Hayirli A., Doepel L., Ambrose D.J. Reproductive performance of dairy cows is influenced by prepartum feed restriction and dietary fatty acid source. J. Dairy Sci. 2009;92:2562–2571. doi: 10.3168/jds.2008-1517. 19447988. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dann H.M., Litherland N.B., Underwood J.P., Bionaz M., D'Angelo A., McFadden J.W., Drackley J.K. Diets during far-off and close-up dry periods affect periparturient metabolism and lactation in multiparous cows. J. Dairy Sci. 2006;89:3563–3577. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(06)72396-7. 16899692. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dikmen S., Hansen P.J. Is the temperature-humidity index the best indicator of heat stress in lactating dairy cows in a subtropical environment? J. Dairy Sci. 2009;92:109–116. doi: 10.3168/jds.2008-1370. 19109269. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources