Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Nov 18:13:1041889.
doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.1041889. eCollection 2022.

Gastroesophageal reflux related changes after sleeve gastrectomy and sleeve gastrectomy with fundoplication: A retrospective single center study

Affiliations

Gastroesophageal reflux related changes after sleeve gastrectomy and sleeve gastrectomy with fundoplication: A retrospective single center study

Aikebaier Aili et al. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). .

Abstract

Background: The worsening of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and "de novo" GERD after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is a major concern as it affects the patient's quality of life; the incidence of GERD after LSG is up to 35%. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy with fundoplication (LSGFD) is a new procedure which is considered to be better for patients with morbid obesity and GERD, but there is a lack of objective evidence to support this statement. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness, safety, and results of LSG and LSGFD on patients who were morbidly obese with or without GERD over an average of 34 months follow-up.

Methods: Fifty-six patients who were classified as obese underwent surgery from January 2018 to January 2020. Patients who were obese and did not have GERD underwent LSG and patients who were obese and did have GERD underwent LSFGD. The minimum follow-up time was 22 months and there were 11 cases lost during the follow-up period. We analyzed the short-term complications and medium-term results in terms of weight loss, incidence of de novo GERD/resolution of GERD, and remission of co-morbidities with follow-up.

Results: A total of 45 patients completed the follow-up and a questionnaire-based evaluation (GERD-Q), of whom 23 patients underwent LSG and 22 patients underwent LSGFD. We had 1 case of leak after LSGFD.No medium or long- term complications. The patient's weight decreased from an average of 111.6 ± 11.8 Kg to 79.8 ± 12.2 Kg (P = 0.000) after LSG and from 104.3 ± 17.0 Kg to 73.7 ± 13.1 Kg (P = 0.000) after LSGFD. The GERD-Q scores increased from 6.70 ± 0.5 to 7.26 ± 1.7 (P = 0.016) after LSG and decreased from 8.86 ± 1.3 to 6.45 ± 0.8 (P = 0.0004) after LSGFD. The incidence of de novo GERD after LSG was 12 (52.2%) at the 12 month follow-up and 7 (30.4%) at the mean 34 (22-48) month follow-up. The remission of reflux symptoms, for patients who underwent LSGFD, was seen in 19 (86.4%) of 22 patients at 12 months and 20 (90.9%) of 22 patients at the mean 34 (22-48) month follow-up. The two groups did not have any significant difference in the effect of weight reduction and comorbidity resolution.

Conclusion: The incidence of de novo GERD after LSG is high,LSG resulted in the same weight loss and comorbidity resolution as LSGFD, in patients who are morbidly obese and experience GERD, and LFDSG prevent the occurrence and development of GERD, combination of LSG with fundoplication (LSGFD) is a feasible and safe procedure with good postoperative results,which worthy of further clinical application.

Keywords: GERD after bariatric surgery; de novo GERD after sleeve gastrectomy; gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD); laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG); laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy with fundoplication.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy with fundoplication (LSGFD). (A) Sleeve gastrectomy with preserved fin shaped fundus; (B) Sleeve gastrectomy with Nissen fundoplication; (C) sleeve gastrectomy with Toupet fundoplication; (D) Sleeve gastrectomy with Dor fundoplication.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Mayoral LP, Andrade GM, Mayoral EP, Huerta TH, Canseco SP, Rodal Canales FJ, et al. . Obesity subtypes, related biomarkers & heterogeneity. Indian J Med Res (2020) 151(1):11–21. doi: 10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_1768_17 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Caballero B. Humans against obesity: Who will win? Adv Nutr (Bethesda Md) (2019) 10(suppl_1):S4–9. doi: 10.1093/advances/nmy055 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Vakil N, van Zanten SV, Kahrilas P, Dent J, Jones R, Global Consensus Group . The Montreal definition and classification of gastroesophageal reflux disease: a global evidence-based consensus. Am J Gastroenterol (2006) 101(8):1900–43. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00630.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Eusebi LH, Ratnakumaran R, Yuan Y, Solaymani-Dodaran M, Bazzoli F, Ford AC. Global prevalence of, and risk factors for, gastro-oesophageal reflux symptoms: A meta-analysis. Gut (2018) 67(3):430–40. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2016-313589 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bou Daher H, Sharara AI. Gastroesophageal reflux disease, obesity and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: The burning questions. World J Gastroenterol (2019) 25(33):4805–13. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i33.4805 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types