The impact of paid social Q&A on panic buying and digital hoarding at the stage of coexistence with COVID-19: The moderating role of sensitivity to pain of payment
- PMID: 36465701
- PMCID: PMC9708103
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103472
The impact of paid social Q&A on panic buying and digital hoarding at the stage of coexistence with COVID-19: The moderating role of sensitivity to pain of payment
Abstract
The worldwide disaster caused by COVID-19 and its variants has changed the behavior and psychology of consumers. Panic buying and hoarding of various commodities continue to emerge in our daily life. Meanwhile, many scholars have focused on the causes of panic buying and hoarding of physical products like daily necessities and food during the outbreak of COVID-19. In fact, the phenomenon of panic buying and digital hoarding of paid social Q&A and other digital content products is very prominent, both in the outbreak period of COVID-19 epidemic and the current coexistence stage. However, the existing literature lacks empirical research to explore this phenomenon, and the psychological mechanism behind it has not been clearly revealed. Therefore, at the current stage of coexistence with COVID-19, based on the SOBC framework, we developed a theoretical model and explored the causes of panic buying and digital hoarding in paid social Q&A. The data collected from 863 paid social Q&A users in China are empirically tested. The results show that the characteristics of paid social Q&A (usefulness, ease of use, professionalism and value) can cause emotional contagion among platform users, activate their willingness to pay, and finally lead to digital hoarding and panic buying behavior of COVID-19 co-existence stage. In addition, the sensitivity to pain of payment moderates the relationship between emotional contagion and willingness to pay. Compared with the spendthrifts, the tightwads are more willing to pay. The conclusions will have positive significance for improving the retail service of digital content platform and promoting the consumption of digital content.
Keywords: Digital hoarding; Emotional contagion; Paid social Q&A; Panic buying; Sensitivity to pain of payment.
© 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Anxiety and Panic Buying Behaviour during COVID-19 Pandemic-A Qualitative Analysis of Toilet Paper Hoarding Contents on Twitter.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jan 27;18(3):1127. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18031127. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021. PMID: 33514049 Free PMC article.
-
A Biopsychosocial Approach to Understanding Panic Buying: Integrating Neurobiological, Attachment-Based, and Social-Anthropological Perspectives.Front Psychiatry. 2021 Feb 24;12:652353. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.652353. eCollection 2021. Front Psychiatry. 2021. PMID: 33716838 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Why did all the toilet paper disappear? Distinguishing between panic buying and hoarding during COVID-19.Psychiatry Res. 2021 Sep;303:114062. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2021.114062. Epub 2021 Jun 17. Psychiatry Res. 2021. PMID: 34175712 Free PMC article.
-
Chinese public's panic buying at the beginning of COVID-19 outbreak: The contribution of perceived risk, social media use, and connection with close others.Curr Psychol. 2022;41(11):8157-8166. doi: 10.1007/s12144-021-02072-0. Epub 2021 Jul 23. Curr Psychol. 2022. PMID: 34334986 Free PMC article.
-
Panic buying research: A bibliometric review.Nepal J Epidemiol. 2022 Sep 30;12(3):1224-1230. doi: 10.3126/nje.v12i3.43436. eCollection 2022 Sep. Nepal J Epidemiol. 2022. PMID: 36407053 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
A Multi-Information Spreading Model for One-Time Retweet Information in Complex Networks.Entropy (Basel). 2024 Feb 9;26(2):152. doi: 10.3390/e26020152. Entropy (Basel). 2024. PMID: 38392407 Free PMC article.
-
Is Conspicuous Consumption Influenced by Cyber-Ostracism? A Moderated Mediation Model.Behav Sci (Basel). 2022 Dec 22;13(1):6. doi: 10.3390/bs13010006. Behav Sci (Basel). 2022. PMID: 36661578 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Arafat S.M.Y., Kar S.K., Menon V., Marthoenis M., Marthoenis M., Sharma P., Alradie-Mohamed A., Mukherjee S., Kaliamoorthy S., Kabir R. Media portrayal of panic buying: a content analysis of online news portals. Global Psychiatry. 2020;3:249–254.
-
- Wang X., Shi W., Yuen K.F. A synthesised review of pandemic-driven consumer behaviours and applied theories: towards a unified framework. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduc. 2022;77
-
- Petra J., Petra K. Digital consumer behaviour and eCommerce trends during the COVID-19 crisis. Int. Adv. Econ. Res. 2021;27:83–85.
-
- Choy V. Perishable information in an increasingly mobile world. New Rev. Inf. Netw. 2011;16(2):141–150.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources