Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Nov 17:9:1006038.
doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.1006038. eCollection 2022.

Implementing HPV testing in 9 Latin American countries: The laboratory perspective as observed in the ESTAMPA study

Affiliations

Implementing HPV testing in 9 Latin American countries: The laboratory perspective as observed in the ESTAMPA study

Mary Luz Rol et al. Front Med (Lausanne). .

Abstract

Background: Replacement of cytology screening with HPV testing is recommended and essential for cervical cancer elimination. HPV testing for primary screening was implemented in 12 laboratories within 9 Latin American countries, as part of the ESTAMPA cervical cancer screening study. Our observations provide information on critical operational aspects for HPV testing implementation in diverse resource settings.

Methods: We describe the implementation process of HPV testing in ESTAMPA, focusing on laboratory aspects. We assess the readiness of 12 laboratories to start HPV testing and their continuity capacity to maintain good quality HPV testing until end of recruitment or up to December 2021. Readiness was based on a checklist. Information from the study database; regular meetings and monitoring visits; and a questionnaire on laboratory operational aspects sent in May 2020 were used to assess continuity capacity. Compliance with seven basic requirements (readiness) and eight continuity requirements (continuity capacity) was scored (1 = compliant, 0 = not compliant) and totaled to classify readiness and continuity capacity as very limited, limited, moderate or high. Experiences, challenges, and enablers of the implementation process are also described.

Results: Seven of 12 laboratories had high readiness, three moderate readiness, and of two laboratories new to HPV testing, one had limited readiness and the other very limited readiness. Two of seven laboratories with high readiness also showed high continuity capacity, one moderate continuity capacity, and the other four showed limited continuity capacity since they could not maintain good quality HPV testing over time. Among three laboratories with moderate readiness, one kept moderate continuity capacity and two reached high continuity capacity. The two laboratories new to HPV testing achieved high continuity capacity. Based on gained expertise, five laboratories have become part of national screening programs.

Conclusion: High readiness of laboratories is an essential part of effective implementation of HPV testing. However, high readiness is insufficient to guarantee HPV testing high continuity capacity, for which a "culture of quality" should be established with regular training, robust monitoring and quality assurance systems tailored to local context. All efforts to strengthen HPV laboratories are valuable and crucial to guarantee effective implementation of HPV-based cervical screening.

Keywords: ESTAMPA study; HPV testing; HPV testing implementation; Latin America; cervical cancer screening; readiness and continuity capacity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Author MH was employed by SMS-Oncology, Amsterdam, Netherlands. Author FD was employed by Laboratorio de Patología Oncológica, SAC, Peru. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Steps followed in ESTAMPA for HPV testing implementation.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Laboratory location and health system affiliation.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Laboratories’ readiness and continuity capacity to perform HPV testing throughout recruitment in the ESTAMPA study. Orange circles represent laboratories’ readiness and blue squares laboratories’ continuity capacity as assessed from the start of HPV testing up to December 2021.

References

    1. Arbyn M, Weiderpass E, Bruni L, de Sanjose S, Saraiya M, Ferlay J, et al. Estimates of incidence and mortality of cervical cancer in 2018: a worldwide analysis. Lancet Glob Health. (2020) 8:e191–203. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Quinn M, Babb P, Jones J, Allen E. Effect of screening on incidence of and mortality from cancer of cervix in England: evaluation based on routinely collected statistics. BMJ. (1999) 318:904–8. 10.1136/bmj.318.7188.904 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lazcano-Ponce EC, Moss S, Alonso de Ruíz P, Salmerón Castro J, Hernández Avila M. Cervical cancer screening in developing countries: why is it ineffective? The case of Mexico. Arch Med Res. (1999) 30:240–50. 10.1016/s0188-0128(99)00006-8 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Almonte M, Murillo R, Sanchez GI, Jeronimo J, Salmeron J, Ferreccio C, et al. New paradigms and challenges in cervical cancer prevention and control in Latin America. Salud Publica Mex. (2010) 52:544–59. 10.1590/s0036-36342010000600010 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gage JC, Ferreccio C, Gonzales M, Arroyo R, Huivin M, Robles SC. Follow-up care of women with an abnormal cytology in a low-resource setting. Cancer Detect Prev. (2003) 27:466–71. 10.1016/j.cdp.2003.09.004 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources