The long-term impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on primary and specialized care provision and disease recognition in Germany
- PMID: 36466500
- PMCID: PMC9712961
- DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1006578
The long-term impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on primary and specialized care provision and disease recognition in Germany
Abstract
Background: The COVID-19 pandemic and the imposed lockdowns severely affected routine care in general and specialized physician practices.
Objective: To describe the long-term impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the physician services provision and disease recognition in German physician practices and perceived causes for the observed changes.
Design: Observational study based on medical record data and survey data of general practitioners and specialists' practices.
Participants: 996 general practitioners (GPs) and 798 specialist practices, who documented 6.1 million treatment cases for medical record data analyses and 645 physicians for survey data analyses.
Main measures: Within the medical record data, consultations, specialist referrals, hospital admissions, and documented diagnoses were extracted for the pandemic (March 2020-September 2021) and compared to corresponding pre-pandemic months in 2019. The additional online survey was used to assess changes in practice management during the COVID-19 pandemic and physicians' perceived main causes of affected primary and specialized care provision.
Main results: Hospital admissions (GPs: -22% vs. specialists: -16%), specialist referrals (-6 vs. -3%) and recognized diseases (-9 vs. -8%) significantly decreased over the pandemic. GPs consultations initially decreased (2020: -7%) but compensated at the end of 2021 (+3%), while specialists' consultation did not (-2%). Physicians saw changes in patient behavior, like appointment cancellation, as the main cause of the decrease. Contrary to this, they also mentioned substantial modifications of practice management, like reduced (nursing) home visits (41%) and opening hours (40%), suspended checkups (43%), and delayed consultations for high-risk patients (71%).
Conclusion: The pandemic left its mark on primary and specialized healthcare provision and its utilization. Both patient behavior and organizational changes in practice management may have caused decreased and non-compensation of services. Evaluating the long-term effect on patient outcomes and identifying potential improvements are vital to better prepare for future pandemic waves.
Keywords: COVID-19; disease recognition; healthcare utilization; hospitalization; primary care.
Copyright © 2022 Platen, Bohlken, Hoffmann, Kostev and Michalowsky.
Conflict of interest statement
Author KK was an employee of IQVIA. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The reviewer AS declared a shared parent affiliation with the author JB to the handling editor at the time of review.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Effect of the COVID-19 lockdown on disease recognition and utilisation of healthcare services in the older population in Germany: a cross-sectional study.Age Ageing. 2021 Feb 26;50(2):317-325. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afaa260. Age Ageing. 2021. PMID: 33205150 Free PMC article.
-
The aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic in general practices compared to pre-pandemic times: Longitudinal questionnaire survey among general practitioners and medical practice assistants in Germany on how the pandemic shaped everyday care.Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2025 Jun;195:51-59. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2025.02.002. Epub 2025 Mar 5. Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2025. PMID: 40050155
-
What can we learn from experiences in general practice during the COVID-19 pandemic? A qualitative study.BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Jun 27;23(1):696. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09654-7. BMC Health Serv Res. 2023. PMID: 37370101 Free PMC article.
-
Ensuring the continuation of routine primary care during the COVID-19 pandemic: a review of the international literature.Fam Pract. 2022 Jul 19;39(4):747-761. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmab115. Fam Pract. 2022. PMID: 34611708 Free PMC article. Review.
-
[Digital consultation between the general practitioner and medical specialist].Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2023 Jul 12;167:D7497. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2023. PMID: 37493305 Review. Dutch.
Cited by
-
Medical care services provision and stress experience in urologists during all waves of the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany.Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Feb 9;11:1320489. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1320489. eCollection 2024. Front Med (Lausanne). 2024. PMID: 38405189 Free PMC article.
-
COVID-19 Continues to Burden General Practitioners: Impact on Workload, Provision of Care, and Intention to Leave.Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Jan 20;11(3):320. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11030320. Healthcare (Basel). 2023. PMID: 36766895 Free PMC article.
-
Virtual Outpatient Visits During COVID-19 Pandemic: So Distant, Yet So Close.J Am Heart Assoc. 2023 Feb 7;12(3):e028817. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.122.028817. Epub 2023 Feb 3. J Am Heart Assoc. 2023. PMID: 36734346 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical