Evaluation of strategies for the occupational health risk assessment of chemical toxicants in the workplace based on a quantitative analysis model
- PMID: 36466512
- PMCID: PMC9709462
- DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1035065
Evaluation of strategies for the occupational health risk assessment of chemical toxicants in the workplace based on a quantitative analysis model
Abstract
Objectives: The commonly used methods for the occupational health risk assessment (OHRA) of chemical toxicants cannot fully meet the needs of practical work. This study evaluated OHRA strategies for chemical toxicants in the workplace by establishing a quantitative analysis model.
Methods: Five typical industries in China that implement OHRA using the six common models (the Environmental Protection Agency, Australian, Romanian, Singaporean, International Council on Mining and Metals, and the Control of Substances Hazardous to Health models) were selected as the research objects. We established a quantitative analysis model to compare the six models and applied it to compare the results obtained using each model and preliminarily analyze the advantages, limitations, and application scope of each method.
Results: The risk ratio (RR) values of the six methods decreased in the following order: RREPA > RRCOSHH > RRICMM > RRAustralia > RRSingaporean > RRRomanian (P < 0.05). Among the six models, the Singaporean model had the strongest RR correlation with the other models (P < 0.01). The sequence of RRs obtained from the Singaporean, ICMM, Australian, and Romanian models in the five industries was consistent with the sequence of the three inherent risk levels in those industries. Only the Romanian model could distinguish between the RRs of all five industries. The EPA and Singaporean models could effectively distinguish the differences in inherent risk for four hazard factors (manganese and inorganic compounds, benzene, xylene, and ethyl acetate), with the assessment accuracy being relatively higher for the EPA model.
Conclusions: Among the six models, the EPA model had the relatively highest accuracy in assessing chemical toxicants, followed by the Singaporean model. The EPA and Romanian models were strongest in differentiating the differences in toxicity risk. More studies on OHRA methodology are needed.
Keywords: chemical toxicants; methodology; occupational health; risk assessment; workplace.
Copyright © 2022 Xu, Zhang, Xu, Yuan, Ren, Wang, Shao, Zhou, Zou and Cao.
Conflict of interest statement
Author LX was employed by Zhejiang Tianlan Environmental Protection Engineering Co., Ltd. Author XS was employed by Zhejiang Jidi Testing Technology Co., Ltd. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Quantitative differences between common occupational health risk assessment models.J Occup Health. 2020 Jan;62(1):e12164. doi: 10.1002/1348-9585.12164. J Occup Health. 2020. PMID: 32949432 Free PMC article.
-
Qualitative and quantitative differences between common occupational health risk assessment models in typical industries.J Occup Health. 2018 Sep 26;60(5):337-347. doi: 10.1539/joh.2018-0039-OA. Epub 2018 Jun 5. J Occup Health. 2018. PMID: 29877200 Free PMC article.
-
Occupational health risk assessment methods in China: A scoping review.Front Public Health. 2022 Nov 17;10:1035996. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1035996. eCollection 2022. Front Public Health. 2022. PMID: 36466494 Free PMC article.
-
A multiple and comprehensive approach to assess health risk in amalgam-exposed Chinese workers.Front Public Health. 2022 Sep 20;10:999095. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.999095. eCollection 2022. Front Public Health. 2022. PMID: 36203661 Free PMC article.
-
Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks.J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev. 2003 Nov-Dec;6(6):569-720. doi: 10.1080/10937400390208608. J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev. 2003. PMID: 14698953 Review.
Cited by
-
The prediction of occupational health risks of n-Hexane in small and micro enterprises within China's printing industry using five occupational health risk assessment models.Front Public Health. 2024 Aug 21;12:1399081. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1399081. eCollection 2024. Front Public Health. 2024. PMID: 39234084 Free PMC article.
References
-
- National Research Council(US) Committee on the Institutional Means for Assessment of Risks to Public Health . Risk Assessment in the Federal Government: Managing the Process[M]. Washington DC: National Academies Press; (1983). - PubMed
-
- USEPA . Risk assessment Guidance for Superfund Volume I: Human Health Valuation Manual (Part F, Supplemental Guidance for Inhalation Risk Assessment): EPA/540/-R-070-/002[R]. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; (2009).
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials