Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Nov 17:13:986965.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.986965. eCollection 2022.

Happiness connects: The impact of mood on self-other integration

Affiliations

Happiness connects: The impact of mood on self-other integration

Jing Zhang et al. Front Psychol. .

Abstract

Converging evidence suggests a considerable plasticity of self-representation and self-other boundaries. But what are the factors controlling this plasticity? Here we explored how changes in an individual's affective state impact his/her self-other representation. Participants watched short videos to elicit happiness or sadness before rating unfamiliar faces with happy or sad expressions. After watching the happy video, participants showed more self-other integration of happy than sad faces, while watching the sad video reduced integration for both happy and sad faces equally. This finding suggests the interaction of two processes: Positive mood biases metacontrol toward flexibility, which fosters the processing of features in which self and other might overlap, and possible overlap increases self-other integration. Negative mood, in turn, biases metacontrol toward persistence, which focuses processing on strictly task-relevant feature dimensions, so that possible overlap is less likely to have an impact.

Keywords: affective states; metacontrol; plasticity; self-other integration; self-representation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The experimental procedure.
Figure 2
Figure 2
IOS ratings after watching the happy or sad video. Note that the analyses considered the differences between the happy face and sad face conditions to the neutral face baseline.

References

    1. Akbari Chermahini S., Hommel B. (2012). Creative mood swings: divergent and convergent thinking affect mood in opposite ways. Psychol. Res. 76, 634–640. doi: 10.1007/s00426-011-0358-z - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Aron A., Aron E. N., Smollan D. (1992). Inclusion of other in the self scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 63, 596–612. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.63.4.596 - DOI
    1. Aron A., McLaughlin-Volpe T., Mashek D., Lewandowski G., Wright S. C., Aron E. N. (2004). Including others in the self. Eur. Rev. Soc. Psychol. 15, 101–132. doi: 10.1080/10463280440000008 - DOI
    1. Botvinick M., Cohen J. (1998). Rubber hands ‘feel’ touch that eyes see. Nature 391:756. doi: 10.1038/35784 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Clore G. L., Palmer J. (2009). Affective guidance of intelligent agents: how emotion controls cognition. Cogn. Syst. Res. 10, 21–30. doi: 10.1016/j.cogsys.2008.03.002 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources