Is Two Better Than One? A Retrospective Study on Colorectal Surgery Outcomes Using the Da Vinci® Dual-Console Robot
- PMID: 36467448
- PMCID: PMC9710501
- DOI: 10.17161/kjm.vol15.18278
Is Two Better Than One? A Retrospective Study on Colorectal Surgery Outcomes Using the Da Vinci® Dual-Console Robot
Abstract
Introduction: The da Vinci® surgical system has become standard in many specialties. The dual-console system has increased console time for residents during their training. This study evaluated patient outcomes using the single- versus dual-console system in resident training.
Methods: A retrospective case-control study was conducted of patients who underwent various colorectal surgeries using either the single- or dual-console da Vinci® system. Patient demographics, comorbidities, and outcomes were collected.
Results: Seventy-one patients (54.2%) utilized the single-console and 60 (45.8%) utilized the dual-console. There were no statistically significant differences in patient demographics, procedures performed, conversion to open, ICU admissions, total length of stay, need for blood transfusion, adequacy of surgical margin, number of lymph nodes harvested, anastomotic leak, discharge disposition, or readmission, wound infection, or need for reoperation within 30 days. There was a nonsignificant decrease in operative time with the dual-console system (200.6 vs. 220.2 minutes, p = 0.111).
Conclusions: While this study showed no statistically significant differences between patient outcomes utilizing the single- versus dual-consoles, it showed that it is safe for use in training, and that more research is needed in this area.
Keywords: colectomy; colorectal surgery; internship and residency; robotics.
© 2022 The University of Kansas Medical Center.
Similar articles
-
Comparing the da Vinci si single console and dual console in teaching novice surgeons suturing techniques.JSLS. 2014 Jul-Sep;18(3):e2014.00218. doi: 10.4293/jsls-d-13-0021. JSLS. 2014. PMID: 25392618 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Robotic-assisted minimally invasive surgery for gynecologic and urologic oncology: an evidence-based analysis.Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2010;10(27):1-118. Epub 2010 Dec 1. Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2010. PMID: 23074405 Free PMC article.
-
Single- versus dual-console robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: impact on intraoperative and postoperative outcomes in a teaching institution.World J Urol. 2015 Jun;33(6):781-6. doi: 10.1007/s00345-014-1349-7. Epub 2014 Jun 28. World J Urol. 2015. PMID: 24973046
-
Standard Multiport vs Single-Port Robot-Assisted Simple Prostatectomy: A Single-Center Initial Experience.J Endourol. 2022 Aug;36(8):1057-1062. doi: 10.1089/end.2021.0510. J Endourol. 2022. PMID: 35535849 Review.
-
Robotic right colectomy using the Da Vinci Single-Site® platform: case report.Int J Med Robot. 2013 Sep;9(3):258-61. doi: 10.1002/rcs.1488. Epub 2013 Mar 15. Int J Med Robot. 2013. PMID: 23505247 Review.
Cited by
-
Robotic Beyond Total Mesorectal Excision (bTME) for locally advanced and recurrent anorectal cancer: a systematic review.J Robot Surg. 2025 Jul 16;19(1):397. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02573-1. J Robot Surg. 2025. PMID: 40670732 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Frangou C. [Accessed May 24, 2022];An eye on surgical robots: Once hampered by economics and applicability, robots poised to reshape surgery. 2018 July 9; https://www.generalsurgerynews.com/In-the-News/Article/07-18/An-Eye-on-S... .
-
- Kim CW, Kim CH, Baik SH. Outcomes of robotic-assisted colorectal surgery compared with laparoscopic and open surgery: A systematic review. J Gastrointest Surg. 2014;18(4):816–830. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources